\n\n“The U.S. Department of Energy has concluded that the most likely origin of COVID-19 is a lab leak.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The federal agency reviewed new intelligence, which prompted officials to revise their position that it’s unclear how the virus emerged. The White House and certain members of Congress also reviewed the intelligence, The Wall Street Journal <\/em>reports<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Energy Department’s conclusion is made with “low confidence,” according<\/a> to The New York Times<\/em>, which was quick to point out that “U.S. spy agencies remain divided over the origins of the virus.” The FBI previously concluded<\/a> with “moderate confidence” that intelligence pointed to a lab leak origin; other agencies have been skeptical or undecided.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The shifting consensus on this issue should be a cautionary tale for all the would-be censors who thunderously objected to such talk. In the first year of the pandemic, the idea that COVID-19 might have emerged from a coronavirus research facility in Wuhan, China, was widely branded a racist conspiracy theory. Social media companies such as Facebook vigorously suppressed<\/a> discussion of the lab leak thesis, partly because U.S. health officials and mainstream news outlets expressed absolute confidence that COVID-19 emerged as a result of zoonotic spillover.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n …<\/p>\n\n\n\n “Health officials and intelligence experts may not have enough information to conclusively determine COVID-19’s origins. But the push to not merely decry the lab leak theory but to actively prohibit<\/em> discussion of it\u2014as was the case on Facebook\u2014has not aged well.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n