{"id":10455,"date":"2023-04-16T12:34:59","date_gmt":"2023-04-16T12:34:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=10455"},"modified":"2023-04-16T12:34:59","modified_gmt":"2023-04-16T12:34:59","slug":"the-u-s-took-in-271000-ukrainian-refugees-in-a-year-it-can-handle-more","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=10455","title":{"rendered":"The U.S. Took in 271,000 Ukrainian Refugees in a Year. It Can Handle More."},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\n\n“Nearly a year after Biden’s announcement, the Department of Homeland Security says<\/a> that over 271,000 Ukrainian refugees have been admitted to the United States. More than 117,000 came<\/a> through the “Uniting for Ukraine” program, a private refugee sponsorship scheme through which Americans can volunteer to financially support Ukrainians. Another 150,000 came<\/a> to the U.S. through pathways like the traditional refugee resettlement program or by crossing the U.S.-Mexico border.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bringing in 271,000 refugees, while a modest accomplishment compared to what countries such as Poland<\/a>, Germany<\/a>, and Canada<\/a> have done, is a huge deal in the context of American immigration politics\u2014especially with as little controversy as it provoked. It speaks volumes about America’s ability to absorb large numbers of people without changing something fundamental about its culture, which immigration restrictionists often doubt. Judging by the scores of Americans who stepped up to welcome Ukrainians, American culture is equipped to absorb.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“assimilation potential is a slippery concept. Take language skills: According to EF Education First’s English Proficiency Index, Ukrainians fall<\/a> into the same proficiency band as Cubans, Hondurans, Salvadorans, and Guatemalans. This is roughly true of their economic circumstances as well. Ukraine’s per-capita gross domestic product was $4,835 as of 2021, per the World Bank<\/a>\u2014roughly $200 lower than Guatemala and $300 higher than El Salvador.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Given those factors, Ukrainian refugees may not be as different from other migrant groups as might appear. What has<\/em> been unique is the way Uniting for Ukraine has been successful in capitalizing on and building public buy-in. It offered migrants an organized, predictable, low-drama pathway, and it allowed Americans to contribute to relief efforts directly by sponsoring migrants. Ukrainians leaned into the legal immigration option, and American sponsors gladly helped them do so\u2014both in large numbers. Contrast that with the traditional government refugee resettlement process, which resettled<\/a> just 12 Ukrainian refugees in the first month following the Russian invasion of Ukraine.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
The U.S. Took in 271,000 Ukrainian Refugees in a Year. It Can Handle More.<\/a><\/blockquote>