{"id":10753,"date":"2023-05-22T16:01:19","date_gmt":"2023-05-22T16:01:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=10753"},"modified":"2023-05-22T16:01:19","modified_gmt":"2023-05-22T16:01:19","slug":"red-states-are-trying-to-fight-the-world-on-climate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=10753","title":{"rendered":"Red States Are Trying To Fight The World On Climate"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\n\n“State Rep. Jeff Hoverson didn\u2019t want anyone getting in the way of using fossil fuels in North Dakota. Not the United Nations. Not international nonprofits. Certainly not the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. So he made a law to stop them<\/a>. In March, the North Dakota legislature passed a bill that Hoverson co-authored with a state senator. It\u2019s short, sweet and to the point: \u201cA climate control-related regulation of an international organization, either directly through the organization or indirectly through law or regulation, is not enforceable on this state.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hoverson told me he isn\u2019t sure what that will mean the next time the federal government wants to sign a climate treaty. Frankly, he\u2019d prefer the feds not have that kind of power, anyway. But while his law stands out for the scope of its ambitions, it\u2019s not exactly an outlier in its spirit. Across the country, bills pushing back against climate policy have been a trend this legislative session, with multiple states proposing \u2014 and passing \u2014 laws that would undermine efforts to limit greenhouse gas emissions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some of the laws aim to support the oil and gas industry in various ways, such as a bill in Indiana that amends clean-energy incentives for utility companies<\/a> to include building natural-gas power plants as long as they can be said to displace coal, or another in Kentucky barring conservation easements in the state<\/a> from infringing on the activities of oil and gas industries. Others have taken the form of preemption laws, barring cities and other regional governments from setting more stringent environmental regulations than the surrounding state. This includes laws preventing bans on gas stoves<\/a> and requiring municipalities to include natural gas as a source of clean energy<\/a>, as well as bills that would prevent them from banning<\/a> the use of certain refrigerants before the federal government does<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

None of this is exactly good Earth Day tidings. And, more importantly, this legislation highlights what a mess American climate policy is. These laws pit different branches of government against each other, roll back some environmental protections established in legislation of years\u2019 past and, in the case of North Dakota, create laws to prevent things that are not currently happening and likely wouldn\u2019t be enforceable if they did. Meanwhile, plenty of other states<\/a> are introducing and often passing bills<\/a> that do<\/em> directly or indirectly reduce<\/a> greenhouse gas emissions<\/a>. The result is that predicting the near-term future of environmental regulation in this country is really hard. And that, economists say, can end up making it more expensive \u2014 and less appealing \u2014 to reduce emissions.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
Red States Are Trying To Fight The World On Climate<\/a><\/blockquote>