{"id":11340,"date":"2023-08-02T11:45:00","date_gmt":"2023-08-02T11:45:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=11340"},"modified":"2023-08-02T11:45:00","modified_gmt":"2023-08-02T11:45:00","slug":"how-the-supreme-court-put-itself-in-charge-of-the-executive-branch","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=11340","title":{"rendered":"How the Supreme Court put itself in charge of the executive branch"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\n\n“In the less than three years since President Joe Biden<\/a> took office, the Supreme Court<\/a> has effectively seized control over federal housing policy<\/a>, decided which workers must be vaccinated against Covid-19<\/a>, stripped the EPA of much of its power<\/a> to fight climate change<\/a>, and rewritten a federal law<\/a> permitting the secretary of education to modify or forgive student loans<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In each of these decisions, the Court relied on something known as the \u201cmajor questions doctrine,\u201d which allows the Court to effectively veto any action by a federal agency that five justices deem to be too economically significant or too politically controversial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This major questions doctrine, at least as it is understood by the Court\u2019s current majority, emerged almost from thin air in the past several years. And it has been wielded almost exclusively by Republican-appointed justices to invalidate policies<\/a> created by a Democratic administration. This doctrine is mentioned nowhere in the Constitution<\/a>. Nor is it mentioned in any federal statute. It appears to have been completely made up by justices who want to wield outsize control over federal policy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And the implications of this doctrine are breathtaking. In practice, the major questions doctrine makes the Supreme Court the final word on any policy question that Congress<\/a> has delegated to an executive branch agency \u2014 effectively giving the unelected justices the power to override both elected branches of the federal government.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Consider, for example, the Court\u2019s recent decision in Biden v. Nebraska<\/em><\/a>, which invalidated a Biden administration program that would have forgiven up to $20,000 in debt for millions of student loan borrowers. The Court did so despite a federal law<\/a> known as the Heroes Act, which permits the secretary of education to \u201cwaive or modify any statutory or regulatory provision applicable to the student financial assistance programs … as the Secretary deems necessary in connection with a war or other military operation or national emergency.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So Congress explicitly granted the executive branch the power to alter or forgive student loan obligations during a national crisis like the Covid-19 pandemic. But six justices, the ones appointed by Republican presidents, decided that they knew better than both Congress and the executive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The premise of the major questions doctrine is that courts should cast an unusually skeptical eye on federal agencies that push out ambitious new policies. As the Court said in a 2014 opinion<\/a>, \u201cwe expect Congress to speak clearly if it wishes to assign to an agency decisions of vast \u2018economic and political significance.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In practice, however, this doctrine functions more as a freewheeling judicial veto than as a principled check on agencies. The Heroes Act, after all, is crystal clear<\/a> in giving Education Secretary Miguel Cardona \u2014 and not the Supreme Court \u2014 final say over which loans are forgiven during a national emergency.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.vox.com\/scotus\/23791610\/supreme-court-major-questions-doctrine-nebraska-biden-student-loans-gorsuch-barrett<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“In the less than three years since President Joe Biden took office, the Supreme Court has effectively seized control over federal housing policy, decided which workers must be vaccinated against Covid-19, stripped the EPA of much of its power to fight climate change, and rewritten a federal law permitting the secretary of education to modify or forgive student loans.
\nIn each of these decisions, the Court relied on something known as the \u201cmajor questions doctrine,\u201d which allows the Court to effectively veto any action by a federal agency that five justices deem to be too economically significant or too politically controversial.<\/p>\n

This major questions doctrine, at least as it is understood by the Court\u2019s current majority, emerged almost from thin air in the past several years. And it has been wielded almost exclusively by Republican-appointed justices to invalidate policies created by a Democratic administration. This doctrine is mentioned nowhere in the Constitution. Nor is it mentioned in any federal statute. It appears to have been completely made up by justices who want to wield outsize control over federal policy.<\/p>\n

And the implications of this doctrine are breathtaking. In practice, the major questions doctrine makes the Supreme Court the final word on any policy question that Congress has delegated to an executive branch agency \u2014 effectively giving the unelected justices the power to override both elected branches of the federal government.<\/p>\n

Consider, for example, the Court\u2019s recent decision in Biden v. Nebraska, which invalidated a Biden administration program that would have forgiven up to $20,000 in debt for millions of student loan borrowers. The Court did so despite a federal law known as the Heroes Act, which permits the secretary of education to \u201cwaive or modify any statutory or regulatory provision applicable to the student financial assistance programs … as the Secretary deems necessary in connection with a war or other military operation or national emergency.\u201d<\/p>\n

So Congress explicitly granted the executive branch the power to alter or forgive student loan obligations during a national crisis like the Covid-19 pandemic. But six justices, the ones appointed by Republican presidents, decided that they knew better than both Congress and the executive.<\/p>\n

The premise of the major questions doctrine is that courts should cast an unusually skeptical eye on federal agencies that push out ambitious new policies. As the Court said in a 2014 opinion, \u201cwe expect Congress to speak clearly if it wishes to assign to an agency decisions of vast \u2018economic and political significance.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

In practice, however, this doctrine functions more as a freewheeling judicial veto than as a principled check on agencies. The Heroes Act, after all, is crystal clear in giving Education Secretary Miguel Cardona \u2014 and not the Supreme Court \u2014 final say over which loans are forgiven during a national emergency.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[790,927,1213,813,1255,528],"class_list":["post-11340","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-share","tag-courts","tag-executive","tag-judiciary","tag-presidency","tag-separation-of-powers","tag-supreme-court"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11340","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11340"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11340\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11341,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11340\/revisions\/11341"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11340"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}