{"id":12519,"date":"2023-12-30T15:19:32","date_gmt":"2023-12-30T15:19:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=12519"},"modified":"2023-12-30T15:19:32","modified_gmt":"2023-12-30T15:19:32","slug":"federal-shipping-regulations-sank-one-of-americas-biggest-offshore-wind-projects","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=12519","title":{"rendered":"Federal Shipping Regulations Sank One of America’s Biggest Offshore Wind Projects"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\n\n“That Reuters report<\/a> doesn’t include a specific mention of the Jones Act\u2014the century-old law that effectively bans foreign-built ships from operating between American ports, and that subsequently drives up the cost of shipbuilding and shipping in the United States\u2014but the subtext is pretty clear. In a call with reporters a few days after the project was canceled, \u00d8rsted CEO Mads Nipper cited<\/a> “significant delays on vessel availability” caused “a situation where we would need to go out and recontract all or very large scopes of the project at expectedly higher prices.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That’s what the Jones Act<\/a> does. As Reason<\/em> has reported on many<\/a> other<\/a> occasions<\/a>, the Jones Act is a nakedly protectionist law that severely limits competition<\/a> in the American shipping market by requiring that ships operating between U.S. ports are American-built, American-crewed, and American-flagged.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Building offshore wind farms requires ships that can deliver supplies to the construction site and some specialty ships that serve as a base for building the turbines. While there are plenty of ships around the rest of the world that can do that work, companies like \u00d8rsted can’t use those ships to build wind farms in American coastal waters.”  
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
Federal Shipping Regulations Sank One of America’s Biggest Offshore Wind Projects<\/a><\/blockquote>