“”The U.S. spends resources training hundreds of thousands of international students every year, but only provides opportunities for a fraction of them to stay after graduation,” says Connor O’Brien, a research and policy analyst at the Economic Innovation Group (EIG), a bipartisan public policy organization. “This is an incredible gift to China and other competitors, who have their best and brightest educated in America and then forced back home by our backward immigration system.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n
An EIG analysis<\/a> released yesterday found that only four in 10 international graduates of U.S. universities end up staying in the country long-term, according to data from the National Survey of College Graduates. Three-quarters of Ph.D. recipients stay, while half of master’s degree recipients and just 17 percent of bachelor’s degree recipients do. Some may be leaving simply because their best employment prospects are in their home countries or elsewhere. Still, a key factor is that “a growing population of international students is competing for a fixed number of opportunities to stay,” the EIG analysis notes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “Unless we expand skilled visa programs like the H-1B, or add more employment-based green cards, we will continue losing tens of thousands of talented graduates each year,” O’Brien argues. “There are some real downsides to guaranteeing green cards for new graduates”\u2014it may create bad incentives for universities, for one\u2014”but it is clear we need to get better at retention, and that requires more visas.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n A hostile immigration system means<\/a> many international students never make it to the U.S. in the first place. An April report<\/a> from the National Foundation for American Policy, a nonpartisan public policy organization, argued that international students increasingly see Canada as a more favorable destination. Between 2000 and 2021, international student enrollment in Canada increased<\/a> by 544 percent, compared to a 45 percent increase in the United States.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Discussions about high-skilled immigration are often sidetracked in favor of unproductive arguments about the southern border\u2014look no further than last night’s presidential debate<\/a> for proof. That’s a shame. Border policy desperately needs reform and has deep humanitarian and economic implications, but attracting and retaining high-skilled foreign talent are pressing issues too.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n