{"id":14248,"date":"2024-07-19T14:21:40","date_gmt":"2024-07-19T14:21:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=14248"},"modified":"2024-07-19T14:21:41","modified_gmt":"2024-07-19T14:21:41","slug":"why-has-joe-bidens-42-billion-broadband-program-not-connected-one-single-household","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=14248","title":{"rendered":"Why Has Joe Biden’s $42 Billion Broadband Program Not Connected One Single Household?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

“Carr blames the delay on “the addition of a substantive wish list of progressive ideas” to the approval process. In an April 2023 letter<\/a> to Davidson, 11 Republican U.S. senators warned that “NTIA’s bureaucratic red tape and far-left mandates undermine Congress’ intent and would discourage participation from broadband providers while increasing the overall cost of building out broadband networks.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Among several examples, the senators noted that NTIA’s BEAD proposal “requires subgrantees to prioritize certain segments of the workforce, such as ‘individuals with past criminal records’ and ‘justice-impacted [\u2026] participants.'” The infrastructure law that authorized the program merely required contractors to be “in compliance with Federal labor and employment laws.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The previous year, in a letter to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, Republican senators warned that the NTIA’s proposed BEAD rollout “creates a complex, nine-step, ‘iterative’ structure and review process that is likely to mire State broadband offices in excessive bureaucracy and delay connecting unserved and underserved Americans as quickly as possible.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In practice, this is exactly what’s happening: Multiple representatives from the telecommunications industry told MinnPost<\/em> this week<\/a> that they had no interest in applying for a piece of Minnesota’s $652 million in BEAD grants. Brent Christensen, president and CEO of Minnesota Telecom Alliance, which represents 70 Minnesota telecom companies, said, “None of them would bid for the federal grants because of the regulations that would come with it\u2014especially the requirement to provide low-cost services to low-income households in exchange for grants that would allow internet providers to build out their networks.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

MinnPost<\/em> noted that new state laws also “requir[e] companies who receive state grants to pay workers a ‘prevailing wage,’ a basic hourly rate paid on public works projects to a majority of workers in a particular occupation.” Since the federal government’s prevailing wage list does not include telecom workers, “companies in Minnesota would have to pay more because they would have to use a similar, but higher-paying, classification.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
Why Has Joe Biden’s $42 Billion Broadband Program Not Connected One Single Household?<\/a><\/blockquote>