“For Tim Walz, in vitro fertilization (IVF) is a deeply personal issue\u2014or at least he made it seem that way. In several recent interviews, the Minnesota governor and Democratic vice presidential candidate implied or outright suggested that his own two children were conceived using IVF.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
One problem: It’s not true. Walz’s children were conceived using intrauterine insemination (IUI), not IVF. These are two very different things, and the policy conversations about them are fundamentally distinct; many religious conservatives want to prohibit IVF\u2014which can result in the destruction of unused fertilized embryos outside the womb\u2014but not IUI.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Yet Walz tried to link his own personal experience with potential efforts by Republicans to ban IVF. This is misleading, since he and his wife used IUI, not <\/em>IVF.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It was an oft-repeated error. On Facebook, Walz wrote<\/a> that his family had taken advantage of reproductive health care options like <\/em>IVF, which is true enough. But then he told<\/a> the Pod Save America<\/em> podcast that his two kids were born “that way,” in reference to IVF. Worse still, on MSNBC, he flatly stated<\/a>: “Thank God for IVF, my wife and I have two beautiful children.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n It makes sense that some people who have little familiarity with either procedure use IVF as shorthand for both. But Walz should have a more granular understanding of what they involve. Moreover, he has accused his opponents of wanting to ban IVF. Walz attacked his rival, Republican vice presidential candidate J.D. Vance, saying<\/a>: “If it were up to him, I wouldn’t have a family, because of IVF, and the things that we need to do reproductively.”” <\/p>\n\n\n\n …<\/p>\n\n\n\n “The best major media expos\u00e9 on Walz’s incautious truth telling came from CNN’s Andrew Kaczynski, who revealed<\/a> that Walz repeatedly lied about his 1995 arrest for drunk driving when he ran for Congress a decade later.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Walz was stopped for driving 96 mph in a 55 mph zone and admitted to police that he had been drinking. His blood alcohol level was .128.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “But in 2006, his campaign repeatedly told the press that he had not been drinking that night, claiming that his failed field sobriety test was due to a misunderstanding related to hearing loss from his time in the National Guard,” wrote Kaczynski. “The campaign also claimed that Walz was allowed to drive himself to jail that night. None of that was true.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n These were direct lies, and there’s no excuse for them.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n