{"id":15265,"date":"2024-11-05T17:53:42","date_gmt":"2024-11-05T17:53:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=15265"},"modified":"2024-11-05T17:53:42","modified_gmt":"2024-11-05T17:53:42","slug":"a-pro-immigrant-party-wouldnt-want-to-revive-the-failed-senate-border-bill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=15265","title":{"rendered":"A Pro-Immigrant Party Wouldn&#8217;t Want To Revive the Failed Senate Border Bill"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>&#8220;The bill&#8217;s reforms aside, its restrictions would have made the border a much more dangerous and inaccessible place for people seeking protection. A similar border-buttoning authority during the pandemic didn&#8217;t&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.migrationpolicy.org\/article\/title-42-autopsy\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">prevent<\/a>&nbsp;crossings, but it did lead to&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/humanrightsfirst.org\/library\/biden-administration-use-and-expansion-of-trump-policy-to-ban-people-seeking-asylum-endangers-lives-tramples-human-rights\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">thousands<\/a>&nbsp;of reported instances of kidnapping, torture, and rape suffered by asylum seekers who were returned to or stopped in Mexico. Fortifying the border against asylum seekers, as the bipartisan bill would&#8217;ve done and as President Joe Biden is now&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/briefing-room\/statements-releases\/2024\/06\/04\/fact-sheet-president-biden-announces-new-actions-to-secure-the-border\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">doing<\/a>, keeps vulnerable migrants in danger.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Harris and Walz&#8217;s eagerness to defend the failed border bill is a sign of the Democratic Party&#8217;s rightward shift on immigration and border security this year. The legislation had no grand reform\u2014no pathway to citizenship for undocumented longtime residents, no solution for Dreamers, no farm work visa improvements\u2014to balance the significant asylum restrictions. But the border and immigration have increasingly become liabilities for Democrats (and top&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/thehill.com\/business\/4828253-most-voters-in-new-poll-say-economy-immigration-most-important-issues-in-2024\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">priorities<\/a>&nbsp;for voters), so their messaging has gotten&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/politics\/2024-election\/-border-broken-democrats-solidify-shift-tougher-migration-stance-conve-rcna167638\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">tougher<\/a>&nbsp;and their appetite for restrictionism has grown.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Congress&nbsp;<em>should<\/em>&nbsp;work on immigration reform instead of relying on the president to patch up the broken system. As Walz said in yesterday&#8217;s debate, &#8220;You can&#8217;t just do this through the executive branch.&#8221; Questions of process aside, this year&#8217;s bipartisan bill wasn&#8217;t the silver bullet or the humane solution Democrats keep suggesting.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-wp-embed is-provider-reason-com wp-block-embed-reason-com\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jjYKkBk4vv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/reason.com\/2024\/10\/02\/a-pro-immigrant-party-wouldnt-want-to-revive-the-failed-senate-border-bill\/\">A Pro-Immigrant Party Wouldn&#8217;t Want To Revive the Failed Senate Border Bill<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;A Pro-Immigrant Party Wouldn&#039;t Want To Revive the Failed Senate Border Bill&#8221; &#8212; Reason.com\" src=\"https:\/\/reason.com\/2024\/10\/02\/a-pro-immigrant-party-wouldnt-want-to-revive-the-failed-senate-border-bill\/embed\/#?secret=muVG2C5UR7#?secret=jjYKkBk4vv\" data-secret=\"jjYKkBk4vv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;The bill&#8217;s reforms aside, its restrictions would have made the border a much more dangerous and inaccessible place for people seeking protection. A similar border-buttoning authority during the pandemic didn&#8217;t prevent crossings, but it did lead to thousands of reported instances of kidnapping, torture, and rape suffered by asylum seekers who were returned to or stopped in Mexico. Fortifying the border against asylum seekers, as the bipartisan bill would&#8217;ve done and as President Joe Biden is now doing, keeps vulnerable migrants in danger.<br \/>\nHarris and Walz&#8217;s eagerness to defend the failed border bill is a sign of the Democratic Party&#8217;s rightward shift on immigration and border security this year. The legislation had no grand reform\u2014no pathway to citizenship for undocumented longtime residents, no solution for Dreamers, no farm work visa improvements\u2014to balance the significant asylum restrictions. But the border and immigration have increasingly become liabilities for Democrats (and top priorities for voters), so their messaging has gotten tougher and their appetite for restrictionism has grown.<\/p>\n<p>Congress should work on immigration reform instead of relying on the president to patch up the broken system. As Walz said in yesterday&#8217;s debate, &#8220;You can&#8217;t just do this through the executive branch.&#8221; Questions of process aside, this year&#8217;s bipartisan bill wasn&#8217;t the silver bullet or the humane solution Democrats keep suggesting.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/reason.com\/2024\/10\/02\/a-pro-immigrant-party-wouldnt-want-to-revive-the-failed-senate-border-bill\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[905,449,542,26,25,222],"class_list":["post-15265","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-share","tag-bill","tag-border","tag-congress","tag-illegal-immigration","tag-immigration","tag-president"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15265","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15265"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15265\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15266,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15265\/revisions\/15266"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15265"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15265"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15265"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}