{"id":15665,"date":"2024-12-11T12:51:52","date_gmt":"2024-12-11T12:51:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=15665"},"modified":"2024-12-11T12:51:52","modified_gmt":"2024-12-11T12:51:52","slug":"trump-wants-to-use-the-military-for-mass-deportations-can-he-actually-do-that","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=15665","title":{"rendered":"Trump wants to use the military for mass deportations. Can he actually do that?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>&#8220;According to the New York Times, Trump is planning to&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2024\/11\/18\/us\/politics\/trump-military-mass-deportation.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">invoke the Insurrection Act<\/a>&nbsp;to bring in the military to carry out mass deportations. The law is a key exception to the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits the use of the military to enforce federal law without the permission of Congress or the Constitution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Only in rare instances have presidents invoked the Insurrection Act. President George H.W. Bush was the last one to do so amid the 1992 Los Angeles riots that broke out in response to the acquittal of police officers in the beating of Rodney King. President Dwight D. Eisenhower also notably used the Insurrection Act to facilitate the desegregation of schools in Little Rock, Arkansas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The provision of the Insurrection Act most likely to apply in Trump\u2019s case is one that allows the president to unilaterally activate the military domestically to enforce federal law whenever they determine that \u201cunlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion\u2026 make it impracticable [to do so] by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mirasola said Trump would have a \u201crelatively easy time\u201d making the case that cartels trafficking immigrants across the border constitute an \u201cunlawful obstruction\u201d to the enforcement of US immigration law. Trump has in some ways appeared to begin building his case for invoking the Insurrection Act through his rhetoric on the campaign trail this year by describing an \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pbs.org\/newshour\/classroom\/daily-news-lessons\/2024\/07\/trump-claims-greatest-invasion-in-history-happening-at-southern-border\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">invasion of criminals<\/a>\u201d coming across the border.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But Mirasola said it would be harder for Trump to argue that it is impracticable to enforce immigration laws through the \u201cordinary course of judicial proceedings.\u201d That\u2019s because presidents have done so for decades, and border crossings are no longer unusually high: They have&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/short-reads\/2024\/10\/01\/migrant-encounters-at-u-s-mexico-border-have-fallen-sharply-in-2024\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">sharply declined this year<\/a>&nbsp;and are down even from certain points in the first Trump administration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, the law gives the president \u201csole discretion, in most instances\u201d to determine whether the criteria necessary to activate the military have been met, according to 2022 congressional testimony given by Elizabeth Goitein, co-director of the liberty and national security program at the Brennan Center for Justice, and Joseph Nunn, the Center\u2019s counsel in the national security program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Goitein and Nunn also argued that the \u201cvague and broad criteria for invoking the Act, combined with the lack of any provision for judicial or congressional review, render it ripe for abuse.\u201d At that point, their concern was that Trump could have used the Insurrection Act to interfere with the certification of the 2020 election results. The use case is now different, but the potential for overreach is the same.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That is to say, while advocates may challenge Trump on whether the two key criteria for invoking the law have been met, the law gives presidents a wide berth \u2014 and the courts little power.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cFor all practical purposes, courts have been cut out of the process,\u201d Goitein and Nunn write.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\nhttps:\/\/www.vox.com\/politics\/386808\/trump-mass-deportations-military-law\n<\/div><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;According to the New York Times, Trump is planning to invoke the Insurrection Act to bring in the military to carry out mass deportations. The law is a key exception to the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits the use of the military to enforce federal law without the permission of Congress or the Constitution.<br \/>\nOnly in rare instances have presidents invoked the Insurrection Act. President George H.W. Bush was the last one to do so amid the 1992 Los Angeles riots that broke out in response to the acquittal of police officers in the beating of Rodney King. President Dwight D. Eisenhower also notably used the Insurrection Act to facilitate the desegregation of schools in Little Rock, Arkansas.<\/p>\n<p>The provision of the Insurrection Act most likely to apply in Trump\u2019s case is one that allows the president to unilaterally activate the military domestically to enforce federal law whenever they determine that \u201cunlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion\u2026 make it impracticable [to do so] by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mirasola said Trump would have a \u201crelatively easy time\u201d making the case that cartels trafficking immigrants across the border constitute an \u201cunlawful obstruction\u201d to the enforcement of US immigration law. Trump has in some ways appeared to begin building his case for invoking the Insurrection Act through his rhetoric on the campaign trail this year by describing an \u201cinvasion of criminals\u201d coming across the border.<\/p>\n<p>But Mirasola said it would be harder for Trump to argue that it is impracticable to enforce immigration laws through the \u201cordinary course of judicial proceedings.\u201d That\u2019s because presidents have done so for decades, and border crossings are no longer unusually high: They have sharply declined this year and are down even from certain points in the first Trump administration.<\/p>\n<p>However, the law gives the president \u201csole discretion, in most instances\u201d to determine whether the criteria necessary to activate the military have been met, according to 2022 congressional testimony given by Elizabeth Goitein, co-director of the liberty and national security program at the Brennan Center for Justice, and Joseph Nunn, the Center\u2019s counsel in the national security program.<\/p>\n<p>Goitein and Nunn also argued that the \u201cvague and broad criteria for invoking the Act, combined with the lack of any provision for judicial or congressional review, render it ripe for abuse.\u201d At that point, their concern was that Trump could have used the Insurrection Act to interfere with the certification of the 2020 election results. The use case is now different, but the potential for overreach is the same.<\/p>\n<p>That is to say, while advocates may challenge Trump on whether the two key criteria for invoking the law have been met, the law gives presidents a wide berth \u2014 and the courts little power.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor all practical purposes, courts have been cut out of the process,\u201d Goitein and Nunn write.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/www.vox.com\/politics\/386808\/trump-mass-deportations-military-law<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[838,221,26,25,259,170],"class_list":["post-15665","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-share","tag-deportation","tag-donald-trump","tag-illegal-immigration","tag-immigration","tag-military","tag-trump"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15665","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15665"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15665\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15666,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15665\/revisions\/15666"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15665"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15665"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15665"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}