{"id":16366,"date":"2025-02-07T13:11:28","date_gmt":"2025-02-07T13:11:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=16366"},"modified":"2025-02-07T13:11:29","modified_gmt":"2025-02-07T13:11:29","slug":"usaid-paying-for-politico-is-a-nontroversy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=16366","title":{"rendered":"USAID Paying for Politico Is a Nontroversy"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>&#8220;the $8 million figure represents total government expenditures to&nbsp;<em>Politico&nbsp;<\/em>since 2016, not USAID dollars specifically. The amount paid by USAID to&nbsp;<em>Politico&nbsp;<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/thedispatch.com\/article\/fact-check-politico-usaid-funding\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">totals $44,000<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A government agency directly transferring cash to a journalistic outlet that&#8217;s supposed to cover it impartially might still constitute a scandal; in general, the feds should not subsidize journalistic projects. But importantly, USAID was not generously donating the money to&nbsp;<em>Politico<\/em>\u2014the government paid the money in exchange for subscriptions to&nbsp;<em>Politico<\/em>&#8216;s premium content. This is a pretty important difference; USAID is&nbsp;<em>paying<\/em>&nbsp;for the service&nbsp;<em>Politico&nbsp;<\/em>provides, in much the same way that a government agency has to pay for janitorial services, electricity, or office supplies. If a federal office buys a new printer, it isn&#8217;t necessarily malicious. It&nbsp;<em>could be&nbsp;<\/em>malicious, if the printer costs too much money, is defective, or was purchased as part of some kickback scheme\u2014but the reality that government offices need printers isn&#8217;t really up for argument.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>When confronted with these facts, many of the conservative social media accounts asserted that something&nbsp;<em>must&nbsp;<\/em>be awry, since $44,000 is still way too much for a&nbsp;<em>Politico&nbsp;<\/em>subscription. They assume that USAID is overpaying in exchange for favorable coverage of progressive causes and unfavorable coverage of Trump.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But that&#8217;s not what USAID and the other government agencies are paying for. In truth,&nbsp;<em>Politico<\/em>&#8216;s premium product isn&#8217;t political news coverage, progressively slanted or otherwise: It&#8217;s minute-to-minute updates on regulatory decisions that impact specific industries. This is information that political and government agencies need and that&nbsp;<em>Politico&nbsp;<\/em>supplies, for a premium price. As independent journalist Lee Fang points out,&nbsp;<em>Politico&nbsp;<\/em>isn&#8217;t the only game in town:&nbsp;<em>Bloomberg and&nbsp;<\/em>LexisNexis run similar services.&nbsp;<em>Politico<\/em>&#8216;s price tag is comparable to theirs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Politico provides paywalled &#8216;pro&#8217; subscription services that cost over $10,000 per login for up-to-the-minute, detailed reporting on policy decisions and regulations,&#8221;&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.leefang.com\/p\/usaid-funded-journalism-needs-scrutiny\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">writes Fang<\/a>. &#8220;The $8.1 million in Politico subscriptions referenced above relates to years of subscriptions by agency officials across the government.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These services are clearly valuable\u2014in fact,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/deaton_chris\/status\/1887256459756356050\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Republican legislators pay for them, too<\/a>. Customers of&nbsp;<em>Politico&#8217;<\/em>s services include Rep. Lauren Boebert (R\u2013Colo.), Rep. Elise Stefanik (R\u2013N.Y.), and even Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R\u2013La.). Republicans want their staffers well informed of legislative updates. Corie Whalen, a communications director for former Rep. Justin Amash (L\u2013Mich.), notes that it would be both impractical and ultimately more expensive to expect legislative staff to gather the necessary information some other way.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reason.com\/2025\/02\/06\/usaid-paying-for-politico-is-a-nontroversy\">https:\/\/reason.com\/2025\/02\/06\/usaid-paying-for-politico-is-a-nontroversy<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;the $8 million figure represents total government expenditures to Politico since 2016, not USAID dollars specifically. The amount paid by USAID to Politico totals $44,000.<br \/>\nA government agency directly transferring cash to a journalistic outlet that&#8217;s supposed to cover it impartially might still constitute a scandal; in general, the feds should not subsidize journalistic projects. But importantly, USAID was not generously donating the money to Politico\u2014the government paid the money in exchange for subscriptions to Politico&#8217;s premium content. This is a pretty important difference; USAID is paying for the service Politico provides, in much the same way that a government agency has to pay for janitorial services, electricity, or office supplies. If a federal office buys a new printer, it isn&#8217;t necessarily malicious. It could be malicious, if the printer costs too much money, is defective, or was purchased as part of some kickback scheme\u2014but the reality that government offices need printers isn&#8217;t really up for argument.<\/p>\n<p>When confronted with these facts, many of the conservative social media accounts asserted that something must be awry, since $44,000 is still way too much for a Politico subscription. They assume that USAID is overpaying in exchange for favorable coverage of progressive causes and unfavorable coverage of Trump.<\/p>\n<p>But that&#8217;s not what USAID and the other government agencies are paying for. In truth, Politico&#8217;s premium product isn&#8217;t political news coverage, progressively slanted or otherwise: It&#8217;s minute-to-minute updates on regulatory decisions that impact specific industries. This is information that political and government agencies need and that Politico supplies, for a premium price. As independent journalist Lee Fang points out, Politico isn&#8217;t the only game in town: Bloomberg and LexisNexis run similar services. Politico&#8217;s price tag is comparable to theirs.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Politico provides paywalled &#8216;pro&#8217; subscription services that cost over $10,000 per login for up-to-the-minute, detailed reporting on policy decisions and regulations,&#8221; writes Fang. &#8220;The $8.1 million in Politico subscriptions referenced above relates to years of subscriptions by agency officials across the government.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>These services are clearly valuable\u2014in fact, Republican legislators pay for them, too. Customers of Politico&#8217;s services include Rep. Lauren Boebert (R\u2013Colo.), Rep. Elise Stefanik (R\u2013N.Y.), and even Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R\u2013La.). Republicans want their staffers well informed of legislative updates. Corie Whalen, a communications director for former Rep. Justin Amash (L\u2013Mich.), notes that it would be both impractical and ultimately more expensive to expect legislative staff to gather the necessary information some other way.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/reason.com\/2025\/02\/06\/usaid-paying-for-politico-is-a-nontroversy\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[617,951,1598,2161],"class_list":["post-16366","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-share","tag-bureaucracy","tag-corruption","tag-elon-musk","tag-usaid"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16366","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16366"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16366\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16367,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16366\/revisions\/16367"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16366"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=16366"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=16366"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}