{"id":16461,"date":"2025-02-13T12:57:29","date_gmt":"2025-02-13T12:57:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=16461"},"modified":"2025-02-13T12:57:29","modified_gmt":"2025-02-13T12:57:29","slug":"theres-no-need-to-guess-jd-vance-is-ready-to-ignore-the-courts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=16461","title":{"rendered":"There\u2019s No Need to Guess. JD Vance Is Ready to Ignore the Courts."},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>&#8220;Vance\u2019s most comprehensive statement of this radical position came in an interview I conducted with him in January 2023 for&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/magazine\/2024\/03\/15\/mr-maga-goes-to-washington-00147054\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">a profile in POLITICO Magazine<\/a>. During the interview, I referred to comments that he had made&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=PMq1ZEcyztY\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">on a conservative podcast<\/a>&nbsp;in 2021 suggesting that Trump, if reelected, should \u201cfire every single midlevel bureaucrat, [and] every civil servant in the administrative state \u2026 and when the courts stop you, stand before the country like Andrew Jackson did and say: \u2018The chief justice has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;I asked Vance if this was still his view.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cYup,\u201d he responded.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Vance\u2019s rhetorical quibbling aside, his suggestion is radical. The course of action he is recommending \u2014 the president openly defying a Supreme Court order and then challenging the courts to enforce it \u2014 would amount to a full-fledged constitutional crisis of a different sort, one that would entirely upend the existing rules governing the separation of powers between the courts and the executive branch.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/magazine\/2025\/02\/11\/jd-vance-trump-executive-power-supreme-court-00203537\">https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/magazine\/2025\/02\/11\/jd-vance-trump-executive-power-supreme-court-00203537<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Vance\u2019s most comprehensive statement of this radical position came in an interview I conducted with him in January 2023 for a profile in POLITICO Magazine. During the interview, I referred to comments that he had made on a conservative podcast in 2021 suggesting that Trump, if reelected, should \u201cfire every single midlevel bureaucrat, [and] every civil servant in the administrative state \u2026 and when the courts stop you, stand before the country like Andrew Jackson did and say: \u2018The chief justice has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<p> I asked Vance if this was still his view.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYup,\u201d he responded.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Vance\u2019s rhetorical quibbling aside, his suggestion is radical. The course of action he is recommending \u2014 the president openly defying a Supreme Court order and then challenging the courts to enforce it \u2014 would amount to a full-fledged constitutional crisis of a different sort, one that would entirely upend the existing rules governing the separation of powers between the courts and the executive branch.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/magazine\/2025\/02\/11\/jd-vance-trump-executive-power-supreme-court-00203537<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[1104,864,429,790,431,660,1213,1255,2081],"class_list":["post-16461","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-share","tag-authoritarianism","tag-autocracy","tag-constitution","tag-courts","tag-democracy","tag-dictatorship","tag-judiciary","tag-separation-of-powers","tag-vance"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16461","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16461"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16461\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16462,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16461\/revisions\/16462"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16461"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=16461"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=16461"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}