{"id":20751,"date":"2025-12-13T23:50:38","date_gmt":"2025-12-13T23:50:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=20751"},"modified":"2025-12-13T23:50:39","modified_gmt":"2025-12-13T23:50:39","slug":"the-threat-that-supposedly-justified-killing-2-boat-attack-survivors-was-entirely-speculative","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=20751","title":{"rendered":"The ‘Threat’ That Supposedly Justified Killing 2 Boat Attack Survivors Was Entirely Speculative"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

“While the renewed congressional interest in the legal and moral justification for Trump’s bloodthirsty anti-drug strategy is welcome, that inquiry should not be limited to the question of whether one particular attack violated<\/a> the law of war.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The details of Bradley’s defense nevertheless illustrate the outrageous implications of conflating drug smuggling with violent aggression. He argues that the seemingly helpless men in the water, who were blown apart by a second missile while clinging to the boat’s smoldering wreckage, still posed a threat because they could have recovered and delivered whatever cocaine might have remained after the first strike.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In reality, there was no “fight” to stay in. The violence exemplified by this attack is so one-sided that the government’s lawyers claim<\/a> blowing up drug boats does not constitute “hostilities” under the War Powers Resolution because U.S. personnel face no plausible risk of casualties. So we are talking about an “armed conflict” that does not involve “hostilities” yet somehow does involve enemy “combatants”\u2014who, contrary to that label, are not actually engaged in combat.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bradley seems to have determined that the flailing men were engaged in a “hostile act” simply by existing near a boat remnant that might have contained salvageable cocaine. As ridiculous as that position is, it is only a bit more risible than Trump’s assertion<\/a> that supplying cocaine to Americans amounts to “an armed attack against the United States” that justifies a lethal military response.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“There is a risk that the focus on the second strike and specifically the talk of ‘war crimes’ feeds into the administration’s false wartime framing and veils the fact that the entire boat-strikes campaign is murder, full stop,” Cardozo School of Law professor Rebecca Ingber, an expert on the law of war, told<\/a>The New York Times<\/em>. “The administration’s evolving justification for the second strike only lays bare the absurdity of their legal claims for the campaign as a whole\u2014that transporting drugs is somehow the equivalent of wartime hostilities.””  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/reason.com\/2025\/12\/05\/the-threat-that-supposedly-justified-killing-2-boat-attack-survivors-was-entirely-speculative<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“While the renewed congressional interest in the legal and moral justification for Trump’s bloodthirsty anti-drug strategy is welcome, that inquiry should not be limited to the question of whether one particular attack violated the law of war.<\/p>\n

The details of Bradley’s defense nevertheless illustrate the outrageous implications of conflating drug smuggling with violent aggression. He argues that the seemingly helpless men in the water, who were blown apart by a second missile while clinging to the boat’s smoldering wreckage, still posed a threat because they could have recovered and delivered whatever cocaine might have remained after the first strike.<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

In reality, there was no “fight” to stay in. The violence exemplified by this attack is so one-sided that the government’s lawyers claim blowing up drug boats does not constitute “hostilities” under the War Powers Resolution because U.S. personnel face no plausible risk of casualties. So we are talking about an “armed conflict” that does not involve “hostilities” yet somehow does involve enemy “combatants”\u2014who, contrary to that label, are not actually engaged in combat. <\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

Bradley seems to have determined that the flailing men were engaged in a “hostile act” simply by existing near a boat remnant that might have contained salvageable cocaine. As ridiculous as that position is, it is only a bit more risible than Trump’s assertion that supplying cocaine to Americans amounts to “an armed attack against the United States” that justifies a lethal military response.<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

“There is a risk that the focus on the second strike and specifically the talk of ‘war crimes’ feeds into the administration’s false wartime framing and veils the fact that the entire boat-strikes campaign is murder, full stop,” Cardozo School of Law professor Rebecca Ingber, an expert on the law of war, told The New York Times. “The administration’s evolving justification for the second strike only lays bare the absurdity of their legal claims for the campaign as a whole\u2014that transporting drugs is somehow the equivalent of wartime hostilities.”” <\/p>\n

https:\/\/reason.com\/2025\/12\/05\/the-threat-that-supposedly-justified-killing-2-boat-attack-survivors-was-entirely-speculative\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[2050,429,455,221,439,272,355,124,314,259,972,1056,191,170,619,741,989],"class_list":["post-20751","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-share","tag-boats","tag-constitution","tag-department-of-defense","tag-donald-trump","tag-drugs","tag-foreign-affairs","tag-foreign-policy","tag-illegal","tag-international-relations","tag-military","tag-murder","tag-navy","tag-strike","tag-trump","tag-united-states","tag-venezuela","tag-war-on-drugs"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20751","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=20751"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20751\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20752,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20751\/revisions\/20752"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=20751"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=20751"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=20751"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}