{"id":21648,"date":"2026-02-27T21:42:02","date_gmt":"2026-02-27T21:42:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=21648"},"modified":"2026-02-27T21:42:03","modified_gmt":"2026-02-27T21:42:03","slug":"trumps-new-tariffs-are-probably-illegal-too","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=21648","title":{"rendered":"Trump’s New Tariffs Are Probably Illegal Too"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

“These new tariffs are likely unlawful too.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Indeed, Trump’s own attorneys even admitted as much during the legal battle over the original tariffs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

 Trump is leaning on Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Section 122 allows presidents to impose tariffs of up to 15 percent for up to 150 days to “deal with large and serious United States balance-of-payments deficits.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What’s that? The Trump administration wants to pretend\u2014or perhaps wrongly believes\u2014that it’s the same thing as a trade deficit. It’s not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A balance-of-payments deficit is an archaic problem that existed before the introduction of floating exchange rates for foreign currencies. Changes made to the international monetary system in the 1970s\u2014changes that Milton Friedman advocated<\/a>, it’s worth noting\u2014eliminated the circumstances that could lead to a balance-of-payments deficit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“The United States does not have an international payments problem, fundamental or otherwise, and has not had one since we adopted a floating exchange rate more than five decades ago,” explains<\/a> Bryan Riley, director of the Free Trade Initiative at the National Taxpayers Union. “Therefore, Section 122 does not give President Trump the legal authority to impose tariffs.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Just like with the IEEPA tariffs, Trump’s use of Section 122 ignores the plain language of the law and invokes a broad executive power where Congress clearly provided a narrow one.”  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/reason.com\/2026\/02\/23\/trumps-new-tariffs-are-probably-illegal-too<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“These new tariffs are likely unlawful too.
\nIndeed, Trump’s own attorneys even admitted as much during the legal battle over the original tariffs.<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

Trump is leaning on Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

Section 122 allows presidents to impose tariffs of up to 15 percent for up to 150 days to “deal with large and serious United States balance-of-payments deficits.”<\/p>\n

What’s that? The Trump administration wants to pretend\u2014or perhaps wrongly believes\u2014that it’s the same thing as a trade deficit. It’s not.<\/p>\n

A balance-of-payments deficit is an archaic problem that existed before the introduction of floating exchange rates for foreign currencies. Changes made to the international monetary system in the 1970s\u2014changes that Milton Friedman advocated, it’s worth noting\u2014eliminated the circumstances that could lead to a balance-of-payments deficit.<\/p>\n

“The United States does not have an international payments problem, fundamental or otherwise, and has not had one since we adopted a floating exchange rate more than five decades ago,” explains Bryan Riley, director of the Free Trade Initiative at the National Taxpayers Union. “Therefore, Section 122 does not give President Trump the legal authority to impose tariffs.”<\/p>\n

Just like with the IEEPA tariffs, Trump’s use of Section 122 ignores the plain language of the law and invokes a broad executive power where Congress clearly provided a narrow one.” <\/p>\n

https:\/\/reason.com\/2026\/02\/23\/trumps-new-tariffs-are-probably-illegal-too\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[221,290,314,111,528,208,141,170],"class_list":["post-21648","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-share","tag-donald-trump","tag-imports","tag-international-relations","tag-laws","tag-supreme-court","tag-tariffs","tag-taxes","tag-trump"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21648","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=21648"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21648\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21649,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21648\/revisions\/21649"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=21648"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=21648"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=21648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}