{"id":3182,"date":"2020-08-04T21:04:35","date_gmt":"2020-08-04T21:04:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=3182"},"modified":"2020-08-04T21:04:35","modified_gmt":"2020-08-04T21:04:35","slug":"the-private-space-race","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=3182","title":{"rendered":"The Private Space Race"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>\n\n&#8220;Zubrin once worked at Lockheed Martin, where he once discovered a way for a rocket to carry twice as much weight. &#8220;We went to management, the engineers, and said, &#8216;Look, we could double the payload capability for 10 percent extra cost.&#8217; They said, &#8216;Look, if the Air Force wants us to improve the Titan, they&#8217;ll pay us to do it!'&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NASA was paying contractor&#8217;s development costs and then adding 10 percent profit. The more things cost, the bigger the contractor&#8217;s profit. So contractors had little incentive to innovate.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Even NASA now admits this is a problem. During its 2020 budget request, Administrator Jim Bridenstine confessed, &#8220;We have not been good at maintaining schedule and\u2026at maintaining costs.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nor is NASA good at innovating. Their technology was so out of date, says Zubrin, that &#8220;astronauts brought their laptops with them into space\u2014because shuttle computers were obsolete.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I asked, &#8220;When (NASA) saw that the astronauts brought their own computers, why didn&#8217;t they upgrade?&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Because they had an entire philosophy that various components had to be space rated,&#8221; he explains. &#8220;Space rating was very bureaucratic and costly.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>NASA was OK with high costs as long as spaceships were assembled in many congressmen&#8217;s districts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;NASA is a very large job program,&#8221; says Aerospace lawyer James Dunstan. &#8220;By spreading its centers across the country, NASA gets more support from more different congressmen.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Congressmen even laugh about it. Rep. Randy Weber (R\u2013Texas) joked, &#8220;We&#8217;ll welcome (NASA) back to Texas to spend lots of money any time.&#8221;&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Twenty years ago, at Lockheed Martin, Zubrin had proposed reusable boosters. His bosses told him: &#8220;Cute idea. But if we sell one of these, we&#8217;re out of business.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Zubrin explains, &#8220;They wanted to keep the cost of space launch high.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Thankfully, now that self-interested entrepreneurs compete, space travel will get cheaper. Musk can&#8217;t waste a dollar. Space X must compete with Jeff Bezos&#8217; Blue Origin, Richard Branson&#8217;s Virgin Galactic, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and others.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed-wordpress wp-block-embed is-type-wp-embed is-provider-reason-com\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"840t8fX1k7\"><a href=\"https:\/\/reason.com\/2020\/07\/29\/the-private-space-race\/\">The Private Space Race<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;The Private Space Race&#8221; &#8212; Reason.com\" src=\"https:\/\/reason.com\/2020\/07\/29\/the-private-space-race\/embed\/#?secret=jK6hrvZuVi#?secret=840t8fX1k7\" data-secret=\"840t8fX1k7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Zubrin once worked at Lockheed Martin, where he once discovered a way for a rocket to carry twice as much weight. &#8220;We went to management, the engineers, and said, &#8216;Look, we could double the payload capability for 10 percent extra cost.&#8217; They said, &#8216;Look, if the Air Force wants us to improve the Titan, they&#8217;ll pay us to do it!'&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>NASA was paying contractor&#8217;s development costs and then adding 10 percent profit. The more things cost, the bigger the contractor&#8217;s profit. So contractors had little incentive to innovate.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Even NASA now admits this is a problem. During its 2020 budget request, Administrator Jim Bridenstine confessed, &#8220;We have not been good at maintaining schedule and\u2026at maintaining costs.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Nor is NASA good at innovating. Their technology was so out of date, says Zubrin, that &#8220;astronauts brought their laptops with them into space\u2014because shuttle computers were obsolete.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I asked, &#8220;When (NASA) saw that the astronauts brought their own computers, why didn&#8217;t they upgrade?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Because they had an entire philosophy that various components had to be space rated,&#8221; he explains. &#8220;Space rating was very bureaucratic and costly.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>NASA was OK with high costs as long as spaceships were assembled in many congressmen&#8217;s districts.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;NASA is a very large job program,&#8221; says Aerospace lawyer James Dunstan. &#8220;By spreading its centers across the country, NASA gets more support from more different congressmen.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Congressmen even laugh about it. Rep. Randy Weber (R\u2013Texas) joked, &#8220;We&#8217;ll welcome (NASA) back to Texas to spend lots of money any time.&#8221;&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Twenty years ago, at Lockheed Martin, Zubrin had proposed reusable boosters. His bosses told him: &#8220;Cute idea. But if we sell one of these, we&#8217;re out of business.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Zubrin explains, &#8220;They wanted to keep the cost of space launch high.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Thankfully, now that self-interested entrepreneurs compete, space travel will get cheaper. Musk can&#8217;t waste a dollar. Space X must compete with Jeff Bezos&#8217; Blue Origin, Richard Branson&#8217;s Virgin Galactic, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and others.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[955],"class_list":["post-3182","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-share","tag-nasa"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3182","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3182"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3182\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3183,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3182\/revisions\/3183"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3182"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3182"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3182"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}