{"id":4887,"date":"2021-04-07T14:19:25","date_gmt":"2021-04-07T14:19:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=4887"},"modified":"2021-04-07T14:19:25","modified_gmt":"2021-04-07T14:19:25","slug":"theres-an-immigration-crisis-but-its-not-the-one-you-think","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=4887","title":{"rendered":"There\u2019s an Immigration Crisis, But It\u2019s Not the One You Think"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\n\n“There\u2019s the crisis of unaccompanied minors arriving in the U.S., of too few beds to house them and of family separations<\/a> happening in Mexico. There\u2019s the crisis of an asylum system that\u2019s broken, and that has become, with most other legal routes into the country severely restricted, America\u2019s de facto immigration system. There\u2019s the crisis of overflowing communities on the Mexican border, populated by people expelled from the U.S. There\u2019s the crisis of immigration courts that take too long; of virtually no work visas available for Central Americans; of economies in Honduras and Guatemala that have been ravaged by Covid-19, a recession, and two hurricanes within the past year; of the misconception all this can be solved by better enforcement at the border; of a political system in the U.S. that seems unable to rise to the enormity of the challenge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Right now, the number of unauthorized immigrants crossing the border is lower than it was in the early 2000s. It\u2019s lower than in 2019″<\/p>\n\n\n\n

…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“What there is not<\/em> is a crisis of migrants \u2014 at least not yet. There\u2019s not a crisis of large numbers of unauthorized migrants staying in the U.S., as we saw in 2019, 2016 and 2014. There have been periods where the government took people in and released them into the U.S. in large numbers. That\u2019s not happening right now because of the [pandemic-era] public health order, which allows the U.S. to expel people more quickly.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Every time we beef up enforcement, or do something slightly more draconian, it works for a while, and then, sooner or later, people find a way around it. Enforcement works if it pushes people into real legal [immigration] channels. But if there are no legal channels, then people will just keep finding their way around enforcement.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Every two or three years, we get a spike of migrants coming to the U.S.-Mexico border. Yet we deal with this each time as though it\u2019s a separate incident that can be controlled, rather than looking at the larger forces at play. There\u2019s something long-term here that we should deal with. So maybe it is<\/em> a crisis, but it\u2019s within a larger crisis that needs to be managed and has been going on for a long time.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“the immediate crises. Unaccompanied minors: [The federal government] made the decision to allow them in without yet having the capacity to be able to house all of them. In the immediate term, they just have to figure out bed space\u2014it\u2019s literally that. They can<\/em> figure that out, they just haven\u2019t yet in ways that meet the needs of a vulnerable population. That\u2019s resolvable. There\u2019s also a really big policy question with long-term play-out: An open-ended policy of taking in any<\/em> minor and putting them in the long-term process in the U.S. is likely to encourage even larger flows [of unaccompanied minors] in the future.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[The federal government] needs to make sure they can continue to expel newly arriving families and adults to Mexico. Even though the Biden administration doesn\u2019t want to, they need to do it to buy time. There are a lot of things they\u2019d like to be doing on immigration policy that have nothing<\/em> to do with the border. But as long as there\u2019s a perception that they can\u2019t control the border, they\u2019re not going have the political space to do anything else. They need to be \u201ctough\u201d at the border right now and return adults and families to Mexico in an efficient way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We need legal pathways for workers, and an asylum system that works, because we know some people are legitimately fleeing from violence. Those two things alone would make an enormous difference.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Our asylum system has become the catchall for everything<\/em>. Either you can get to the border, convince people you\u2019re being persecuted, and stay in the U.S., or nothing: You stay home, because there\u2019s not a line for you to get into if you\u2019re from Central America and want to come and work. That makes no sense. Asylum shouldn\u2019t be used [to give] labor pathways. Where we should be headed is creating two different paths: one for people who clearly are motivated by the need to leave their home country because of safety, and another for people aspiring to make their lives better by making more money.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The way you fix the asylum system is by taking it out of the hands of the immigration courts and putting it in the hands of asylum officers at the border. Immigration courts are actually quite uneven because they\u2019re political appointments, so their decisions tend to be all over the place depending on which judge you get. Asylum officers can make decisions quickly, tend to be fairly consistent, are efficient, and you can hire them much more easily.” <\/p>\n\n\n\n

…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“we also need a legal pathway for people who want to come and work. For Mexicans who want to work in the U.S., there\u2019s an actual line to get into. We don\u2019t have that for Central Americans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of the reasons why Mexican migration [to the U.S.] went down so much after 2007 is that there are about 260,000 people every year who come from Mexico to work legally in the U.S. and go back home. In 2019, the comparable number [for Central Americans] was 8,000; last year, it was about 5,500. There really is no line for a Central American to get into. But people are coming anyway, so let\u2019s give them a chance to come legally\u2014at least some of them. It\u2019s what we did with Mexico, and that has kept numbers [of unauthorized immigrants from Mexico] low because they\u2019re getting what they need: a chance to make money.” <\/p>\n\n\n\n

…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“The demand is constantly there for people to leave and come to the U.S., but the huge surges happen when people either have a greater motivation to leave or they think they have a greater opportunity of getting into the United States. In this case, those came together.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Over the past year, there were two hurricanes in Honduras and Guatemala, plus the collapse of fragile economies because of Covid. And that created a huge<\/em> demand for people to come north to the U.S. There was also an expectation around the transition to the Biden administration that made people believe that they could get in. And\u2014probably more important than that\u2014there is a reality that the U.S. does <\/em>let some people in, particularly unaccompanied minors and some families.” <\/p>\n\n\n\n

…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“At the border, our options are either you send people back quickly or you release them into the U.S. for the next two or three years, during which time their case goes through a very slow process in the immigration courts. What ends up happening is that if you\u2019re released into the U.S., you almost certainly never go back [to your home country].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There\u2019s a very reputable study that the [Department of Homeland Security] did where they looked at what happened from 2014 to 2019 with Central American and Mexican migrants. The Mexican migrants mostly got sent back pretty quickly. But 72 percent of the Central Americans who arrived between 2014 and 2019 were admitted into the U.S., and there\u2019s no record of their departure. And if, in fact, you\u2019re being allowed into the U.S. and there is no real process to figure out what happened to you, that\u2019s a lousy system.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/magazine\/2021\/03\/25\/border-crisis-immigration-explained-biden-trump-mexico-478049<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“There\u2019s the crisis of unaccompanied minors arriving in the U.S., of too few beds to house them and of family separations happening in Mexico. There\u2019s the crisis of an asylum system that\u2019s broken, and that has become, with most other legal routes into the country severely restricted, America\u2019s de facto immigration system. There\u2019s the crisis of overflowing communities on the Mexican border, populated by people expelled from the U.S. There\u2019s the crisis of immigration courts that take too long; of virtually no work visas available for Central Americans; of economies in Honduras and Guatemala that have been ravaged by Covid-19, a recession, and two hurricanes within the past year; of the misconception all this can be solved by better enforcement at the border; of a political system in the U.S. that seems unable to rise to the enormity of the challenge.<\/p>\n

Right now, the number of unauthorized immigrants crossing the border is lower than it was in the early 2000s. It\u2019s lower than in 2019”<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

“What there is not is a crisis of migrants \u2014 at least not yet. There\u2019s not a crisis of large numbers of unauthorized migrants staying in the U.S., as we saw in 2019, 2016 and 2014. There have been periods where the government took people in and released them into the U.S. in large numbers. That\u2019s not happening right now because of the [pandemic-era] public health order, which allows the U.S. to expel people more quickly.”<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

“Every time we beef up enforcement, or do something slightly more draconian, it works for a while, and then, sooner or later, people find a way around it. Enforcement works if it pushes people into real legal [immigration] channels. But if there are no legal channels, then people will just keep finding their way around enforcement.”<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

“Every two or three years, we get a spike of migrants coming to the U.S.-Mexico border. Yet we deal with this each time as though it\u2019s a separate incident that can be controlled, rather than looking at the larger forces at play. There\u2019s something long-term here that we should deal with. So maybe it is a crisis, but it\u2019s within a larger crisis that needs to be managed and has been going on for a long time.”<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

“the immediate crises. Unaccompanied minors: [The federal government] made the decision to allow them in without yet having the capacity to be able to house all of them. In the immediate term, they just have to figure out bed space\u2014it\u2019s literally that. They can figure that out, they just haven\u2019t yet in ways that meet the needs of a vulnerable population. That\u2019s resolvable. There\u2019s also a really big policy question with long-term play-out: An open-ended policy of taking in any minor and putting them in the long-term process in the U.S. is likely to encourage even larger flows [of unaccompanied minors] in the future.<\/p>\n

[The federal government] needs to make sure they can continue to expel newly arriving families and adults to Mexico. Even though the Biden administration doesn\u2019t want to, they need to do it to buy time. There are a lot of things they\u2019d like to be doing on immigration policy that have nothing to do with the border. But as long as there\u2019s a perception that they can\u2019t control the border, they\u2019re not going have the political space to do anything else. They need to be \u201ctough\u201d at the border right now and return adults and families to Mexico in an efficient way.<\/p>\n

We need legal pathways for workers, and an asylum system that works, because we know some people are legitimately fleeing from violence. Those two things alone would make an enormous difference.<\/p>\n

Our asylum system has become the catchall for everything. Either you can get to the border, convince people you\u2019re being persecuted, and stay in the U.S., or nothing: You stay home, because there\u2019s not a line for you to get into if you\u2019re from Central America and want to come and work. That makes no sense. Asylum shouldn\u2019t be used [to give] labor pathways. Where we should be headed is creating two different paths: one for people who clearly are motivated by the need to leave their home country because of safety, and another for people aspiring to make their lives better by making more money.<\/p>\n

The way you fix the asylum system is by taking it out of the hands of the immigration courts and putting it in the hands of asylum officers at the border. Immigration courts are actually quite uneven because they\u2019re political appointments, so their decisions tend to be all over the place depending on which judge you get. Asylum officers can make decisions quickly, tend to be fairly consistent, are efficient, and you can hire them much more easily.” <\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

“we also need a legal pathway for people who want to come and work. For Mexicans who want to work in the U.S., there\u2019s an actual line to get into. We don\u2019t have that for Central Americans.<\/p>\n

One of the reasons why Mexican migration [to the U.S.] went down so much after 2007 is that there are about 260,000 people every year who come from Mexico to work legally in the U.S. and go back home. In 2019, the comparable number [for Central Americans] was 8,000; last year, it was about 5,500. There really is no line for a Central American to get into. But people are coming anyway, so let\u2019s give them a chance to come legally\u2014at least some of them. It\u2019s what we did with Mexico, and that has kept numbers [of unauthorized immigrants from Mexico] low because they\u2019re getting what they need: a chance to make money.” <\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

“The demand is constantly there for people to leave and come to the U.S., but the huge surges happen when people either have a greater motivation to leave or they think they have a greater opportunity of getting into the United States. In this case, those came together.<\/p>\n

Over the past year, there were two hurricanes in Honduras and Guatemala, plus the collapse of fragile economies because of Covid. And that created a huge demand for people to come north to the U.S. There was also an expectation around the transition to the Biden administration that made people believe that they could get in. And\u2014probably more important than that\u2014there is a reality that the U.S. does let some people in, particularly unaccompanied minors and some families.” <\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

“At the border, our options are either you send people back quickly or you release them into the U.S. for the next two or three years, during which time their case goes through a very slow process in the immigration courts. What ends up happening is that if you\u2019re released into the U.S., you almost certainly never go back [to your home country].<\/p>\n

There\u2019s a very reputable study that the [Department of Homeland Security] did where they looked at what happened from 2014 to 2019 with Central American and Mexican migrants. The Mexican migrants mostly got sent back pretty quickly. But 72 percent of the Central Americans who arrived between 2014 and 2019 were admitted into the U.S., and there\u2019s no record of their departure. And if, in fact, you\u2019re being allowed into the U.S. and there is no real process to figure out what happened to you, that\u2019s a lousy system.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[268,1231,25,780,945],"class_list":["post-4887","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-share","tag-asylum","tag-central-america","tag-immigration","tag-joe-biden","tag-mexico"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4887","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4887"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4887\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4888,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4887\/revisions\/4888"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4887"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4887"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4887"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}