{"id":5270,"date":"2021-05-30T15:42:58","date_gmt":"2021-05-30T15:42:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=5270"},"modified":"2021-05-30T15:42:58","modified_gmt":"2021-05-30T15:42:58","slug":"republicans-say-they-care-about-election-fraud-heres-how-they-could-actually-prevent-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=5270","title":{"rendered":"Republicans Say They Care About Election Fraud. Here\u2019s How They Could Actually Prevent It."},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>\n\n&#8220;Republicans&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/politics\/state-election-voting-security-laws-georgia\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">care a whole lot<\/a>&nbsp;about election security these days. Fueled in part by the \u201cBig Lie,\u201d the baseless claim that there was widespread fraud in last year\u2019s election, Republican lawmakers around the country have&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/fivethirtyeight.com\/features\/the-states-where-efforts-to-restrict-voting-are-escalating\/\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">made an aggressive push to pass new laws<\/a>&nbsp;to prevent what they saw as a nightmare scenario from happening again. While the motivation to improve election security is spurious, the ostensible goal isn\u2019t \u2014 everyone would agree that a secure election is important for democracy. Experts say there\u2019s one very effective way for state legislatures to make the voting process more secure: pass legislation to update voting machines. But instead of prioritizing this effort, many Republicans are instead focused on limiting voter access.&#8221;<br>&#8230;<br>&#8220;The gold standard for voting security is hand-marked paper ballots,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.brookings.edu\/blog\/techtank\/2019\/08\/14\/why-paper-is-considered-state-of-the-art-voting-technology\/\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">according to security experts<\/a>. That\u2019s because a paper ballot eliminates the risk of technical difficulties or certain kinds of malicious acts (think hacking) that could change or destroy your vote, and any concerns can be addressed with a recount. Because of that, most&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/verifiedvoting.org\/verifier\/#mode\/navigate\/map\/ppEquip\/mapType\/normal\/year\/2020\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">states currently use<\/a>&nbsp;hand-marked paper ballots or have voting machines that generate paper records for verification.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But in six states \u2014 Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Jersey, Tennessee and Texas \u2014 some or all voters still cast ballots on machines that have no paper record whatsoever, according to data from Verified Voting. While there\u2019s no evidence that these machines have ever been hacked during an election, it\u2019s&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.motherjones.com\/politics\/2019\/09\/defcon-2019-hacking-village\/\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">technically possible<\/a>, and they\u2019re also prone to all kinds of undesirable malfunctions, including&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/2004\/11\/computer-loses-4500-votes\/\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">losing<\/a>&nbsp;votes. With no paper backup to audit, these machines are the kind of election security liability that politicians say they\u2019re invested in fixing.&nbsp;Yet according&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/fivethirtyeight.com\/features\/the-states-where-efforts-to-restrict-voting-are-escalating\/\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">to FiveThirtyEight\u2019s past reporting<\/a>&nbsp;and additional calls I made for this story, in five of those six states there has been little or no effort in the past six months to prioritize updating machines with a system that includes a paper record.&#8221;<br>&#8230;<br>&#8220;Instead, state legislatures have been flooding the docket with bills relating to the length of early voting periods, the placement of ballot drop boxes and whether volunteers can give voters waiting in line&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/food\/2021\/04\/09\/georgia-voting-laws-food\/\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\">a bottle of water<\/a>. Meanwhile, just a handful of bills about upgrading equipment \u2014 often without any funding attached \u2014 have trickled in, only to lose momentum and die before reaching a committee.&#8221;<br>&#8230;<br>&#8220;\u201cUnfortunately, I think the idea of security has basically been an excuse to limit access,\u201d said Lawrence Norden, director of the Brennan Center\u2019s Election Reform Program. \u201cIf we really want to ensure that our elections are trustworthy and transparent, we can do that without limiting access.\u201d&#8221;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><a href=\"https:\/\/fivethirtyeight.com\/features\/republicans-say-they-care-about-election-fraud-heres-how-they-could-actually-prevent-it\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/fivethirtyeight.com\/features\/republicans-say-they-care-about-election-fraud-heres-how-they-could-actually-prevent-it\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;Republicans care a whole lot about election security these days. Fueled in part by the \u201cBig Lie,\u201d the baseless claim that there was widespread fraud in last year\u2019s election, Republican lawmakers around the country have made an aggressive push to pass new laws to prevent what they saw as a nightmare scenario from happening again. While the motivation to improve election security is spurious, the ostensible goal isn\u2019t \u2014 everyone would agree that a secure election is important for democracy. Experts say there\u2019s one very effective way for state legislatures to make the voting process more secure: pass legislation to update voting machines. But instead of prioritizing this effort, many Republicans are instead focused on limiting voter access.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The gold standard for voting security is hand-marked paper ballots, according to security experts. That\u2019s because a paper ballot eliminates the risk of technical difficulties or certain kinds of malicious acts (think hacking) that could change or destroy your vote, and any concerns can be addressed with a recount. Because of that, most states currently use hand-marked paper ballots or have voting machines that generate paper records for verification.<br \/>\nBut in six states \u2014 Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Jersey, Tennessee and Texas \u2014 some or all voters still cast ballots on machines that have no paper record whatsoever, according to data from Verified Voting. While there\u2019s no evidence that these machines have ever been hacked during an election, it\u2019s technically possible, and they\u2019re also prone to all kinds of undesirable malfunctions, including losing votes. With no paper backup to audit, these machines are the kind of election security liability that politicians say they\u2019re invested in fixing.<\/p>\n<p> Yet according to FiveThirtyEight\u2019s past reporting and additional calls I made for this story, in five of those six states there has been little or no effort in the past six months to prioritize updating machines with a system that includes a paper record.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Instead, state legislatures have been flooding the docket with bills relating to the length of early voting periods, the placement of ballot drop boxes and whether volunteers can give voters waiting in line a bottle of water. Meanwhile, just a handful of bills about upgrading equipment \u2014 often without any funding attached \u2014 have trickled in, only to lose momentum and die before reaching a committee.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u201cUnfortunately, I think the idea of security has basically been an excuse to limit access,\u201d said Lawrence Norden, director of the Brennan Center\u2019s Election Reform Program. \u201cIf we really want to ensure that our elections are trustworthy and transparent, we can do that without limiting access.\u201d&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[372,198,906,506,1053,714,479],"class_list":["post-5270","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-share","tag-election","tag-elections","tag-legislation","tag-republicans","tag-state-legislatures","tag-voter-fraud","tag-voting"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5270","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5270"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5270\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5271,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5270\/revisions\/5271"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5270"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5270"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5270"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}