{"id":7075,"date":"2022-01-21T15:40:00","date_gmt":"2022-01-21T15:40:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=7075"},"modified":"2022-01-21T15:40:00","modified_gmt":"2022-01-21T15:40:00","slug":"how-does-this-end","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=7075","title":{"rendered":"How does this end?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\n\n“Large majorities of Republicans<\/a> continue to believe the lie that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump, and elected Republicans around the country are acting on this conspiracy theory \u2014 attempting to lock Democrats out of power by seizing partisan control<\/a> of America\u2019s electoral systems.<\/a> Democrats observe all this and gird for battle, with many wondering if the 2024 elections will be held on the level.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These divisions over the fairness of our elections are rooted in an extreme level of political polarization that has divided our society into mutually distrustful \u201cus versus them\u201d camps.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“In a draft paper, McCoy and co-author Ben Press examine every democracy since 1950 to identify instances where this mindset had taken root. One of their most eye-popping findings: None of America\u2019s peer democracies have experienced levels of pernicious polarization as high for as long as the contemporary United States.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cDemocracies have a hard time depolarizing once they\u2019ve reached this level,\u201d McCoy tells me. \u201cI am extremely worried.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But worried about what, exactly? This is the biggest question in American politics: Where does our deeply fractured country go from here?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A deep dive into the academic research on democracy, polarization, and civil conflict is sobering. Virtually all of the experts I spoke with agreed that, in the near term, we are in for a period of heightened struggle. Among the dire forecasts: hotly contested elections whose legitimacy is doubted by the losing side, massive street demonstrations, a paralyzed Congress, and even lethal violence among partisans.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“In his book Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop<\/em><\/a>, political scientist Lee Drutman argues that America\u2019s polarization problem is in large part a product of our two-party electoral system. Unlike elections in multiparty democracies, where leading parties often govern in coalition with others, two-party contests are all-or-nothing: Either your party wins outright or it loses. As a result, every vote takes on apocalyptic stakes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A new draft paper by scholars Noam Gidron, James Adams, and Will Horne uncovers strong evidence for this idea. In a study of 19 Western democracies between 1996 and 2017, they find that ordinary partisans tend to express warmer feelings toward the party\u2019s coalition partners \u2014 both during the coalition and for up to two decades following its end.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIn the US, there\u2019s simply no such mechanism,\u201d Gidron told me. \u201cEven if you have divided government, it\u2019s not perceived as an opportunity to work together but rather to sabotage the other party\u2019s agenda.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Drutman argues for a combination of two reforms<\/a> that could move us toward a more cooperative multiparty system: ranked-choice voting<\/a> and multimember congressional districts in the House of Representatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In ranked-choice elections, voters rank candidates by order of preference rather than selecting just one of them, giving third-party candidates a better chance in congressional elections. In a House with multimember districts,we would have larger districts where multiple candidates could win seats<\/a> to reflect a wider breadth of voter preferences \u2014 a more proportional system of representation than the winner-take-all-status quo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But it\u2019s very hard to see how these reforms could happen anytime soon. Extreme polarization creates a kind of legislative Catch-22: Zero-sum politics means we can\u2019t get bipartisan majorities to change our institutions, while the current institutions intensify zero-sum competition between the parties.” <\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/www.vox.com\/policy-and-politics\/22814025\/democracy-trump-january-6-capitol-riot-election-violence<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Large majorities of Republicans continue to believe the lie that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump, and elected Republicans around the country are acting on this conspiracy theory \u2014 attempting to lock Democrats out of power by seizing partisan control of America\u2019s electoral systems. Democrats observe all this and gird for battle, with many wondering if the 2024 elections will be held on the level.<\/p>\n

These divisions over the fairness of our elections are rooted in an extreme level of political polarization that has divided our society into mutually distrustful \u201cus versus them\u201d camps.”<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

“In a draft paper, McCoy and co-author Ben Press examine every democracy since 1950 to identify instances where this mindset had taken root. One of their most eye-popping findings: None of America\u2019s peer democracies have experienced levels of pernicious polarization as high for as long as the contemporary United States.<\/p>\n

\u201cDemocracies have a hard time depolarizing once they\u2019ve reached this level,\u201d McCoy tells me. \u201cI am extremely worried.\u201d<\/p>\n

But worried about what, exactly? This is the biggest question in American politics: Where does our deeply fractured country go from here?<\/p>\n

A deep dive into the academic research on democracy, polarization, and civil conflict is sobering. Virtually all of the experts I spoke with agreed that, in the near term, we are in for a period of heightened struggle. Among the dire forecasts: hotly contested elections whose legitimacy is doubted by the losing side, massive street demonstrations, a paralyzed Congress, and even lethal violence among partisans.”<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

“In his book Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop, political scientist Lee Drutman argues that America\u2019s polarization problem is in large part a product of our two-party electoral system. Unlike elections in multiparty democracies, where leading parties often govern in coalition with others, two-party contests are all-or-nothing: Either your party wins outright or it loses. As a result, every vote takes on apocalyptic stakes.<\/p>\n

A new draft paper by scholars Noam Gidron, James Adams, and Will Horne uncovers strong evidence for this idea. In a study of 19 Western democracies between 1996 and 2017, they find that ordinary partisans tend to express warmer feelings toward the party\u2019s coalition partners \u2014 both during the coalition and for up to two decades following its end.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn the US, there\u2019s simply no such mechanism,\u201d Gidron told me. \u201cEven if you have divided government, it\u2019s not perceived as an opportunity to work together but rather to sabotage the other party\u2019s agenda.\u201d<\/p>\n

Drutman argues for a combination of two reforms that could move us toward a more cooperative multiparty system: ranked-choice voting and multimember congressional districts in the House of Representatives.<\/p>\n

In ranked-choice elections, voters rank candidates by order of preference rather than selecting just one of them, giving third-party candidates a better chance in congressional elections. In a House with multimember districts, we would have larger districts where multiple candidates could win seats to reflect a wider breadth of voter preferences \u2014 a more proportional system of representation than the winner-take-all-status quo.<\/p>\n

But it\u2019s very hard to see how these reforms could happen anytime soon. Extreme polarization creates a kind of legislative Catch-22: Zero-sum politics means we can\u2019t get bipartisan majorities to change our institutions, while the current institutions intensify zero-sum competition between the parties.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[1104,431,660,221,198,506,479],"class_list":["post-7075","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-share","tag-authoritarianism","tag-democracy","tag-dictatorship","tag-donald-trump","tag-elections","tag-republicans","tag-voting"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7075","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7075"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7075\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7076,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7075\/revisions\/7076"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7075"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7075"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7075"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}