\n\n“First off, the U.S. cannot attack Russia because Congress has yet to declare war on the country. And make no mistake, a direct attack on Russian forces by either the U.S. or NATO would be an act of war. This would bring two of the world’s superpowers into direct conflict for the first time since World War II. The risk of a nuclear attack, on either side, would increase dramatically. Indeed, favorable conditions for an all-out nuclear war would, for the first time in world history, finally be achieved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The plight of the Ukrainians is tragic, but as much as we might like to aid them militarily, the U.S. cannot undertake a course of action with a significant likelihood of causing nuclear annihilation. While it would be gratifying to punish Putin<\/a> for trying to reclaim the Soviet empire, a bad actor’s malicious behavior is no excuse for recklessness on the part of the U.S.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n …<\/p>\n\n\n\n “A no-fly zone is not a magic protective barrier\u2014the U.S. would have to enforce it by shooting down Russian airplanes. Russia’s air force is quite powerful<\/a>, so this would be no easy feat. But in any case, it would still amount to war with Russia. The U.S. must therefore reject Zelenskyy’s heartfelt request<\/a> for a no-fly zone. The Biden administration has thus far wisely indicated that such a move is off the table<\/a>.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n