{"id":8414,"date":"2022-07-21T11:47:49","date_gmt":"2022-07-21T11:47:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=8414"},"modified":"2022-07-21T11:47:49","modified_gmt":"2022-07-21T11:47:49","slug":"same-sex-marriage-could-get-historic-protections-if-the-senate-votes-on-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=8414","title":{"rendered":"Same-sex marriage could get historic protections \u2014 if the Senate votes on it"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>\n\n&#8220;The bill would repeal the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.glaad.org\/marriage\/doma\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">1996 Defense of Marriage Act<\/a>, which previously defined marriage as a legal union between a man and a woman, and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2022\/07\/19\/politics\/house-vote-same-sex-marriage-protections-supreme-court\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">it would guarantee recognition of same-sex marriages and interracial marriages under federal law<\/a>. House Democrats emphasized that this vote was important to enshrine federal protections in the wake of the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.vox.com\/23055298\/supreme-court-roe-abortion-rights\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Supreme Court\u2019s decision to overturn&nbsp;<em>Roe v. Wade<\/em><\/a>and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.vox.com\/2022\/6\/24\/23181723\/roe-v-wade-dobbs-clarence-thomas-concurrence\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Justice Clarence Thomas\u2019s statement<\/a>&nbsp;that other rights, like same-sex marriage, could be considered next.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It\u2019s not yet clear what the fate of the legislation will be in the upper chamber, however.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Passage of this legislation would be historic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It would codify the right to same-sex marriage under federal law and would prevent states from trying to nullify same-sex marriages and interracial marriages if they were valid in the places where they were performed. Ultimately, it\u2019s both a preemptive move that House Democrats are taking if the Supreme Court were to overturn the precedent set by&nbsp;<em>Obergefell v. Hodges<\/em>&nbsp;and a way for them to get Republicans to take a stand on the issue.&#8221;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vox.com\/2022\/7\/20\/23271255\/respect-for-marriage-act-house-vote-republicans-senate\">https:\/\/www.vox.com\/2022\/7\/20\/23271255\/respect-for-marriage-act-house-vote-republicans-senate<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;The bill would repeal the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which previously defined marriage as a legal union between a man and a woman, and it would guarantee recognition of same-sex marriages and interracial marriages under federal law. House Democrats emphasized that this vote was important to enshrine federal protections in the wake of the Supreme Court\u2019s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and Justice Clarence Thomas\u2019s statement that other rights, like same-sex marriage, could be considered next.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s not yet clear what the fate of the legislation will be in the upper chamber, however.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Passage of this legislation would be historic.<\/p>\n<p>It would codify the right to same-sex marriage under federal law and would prevent states from trying to nullify same-sex marriages and interracial marriages if they were valid in the places where they were performed. Ultimately, it\u2019s both a preemptive move that House Democrats are taking if the Supreme Court were to overturn the precedent set by Obergefell v. Hodges and a way for them to get Republicans to take a stand on the issue.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[542,1692,1261,865],"class_list":["post-8414","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-share","tag-congress","tag-gay-marriage","tag-marriage","tag-senate"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8414","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8414"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8414\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8415,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8414\/revisions\/8415"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8414"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8414"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8414"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}