{"id":8561,"date":"2022-08-09T11:42:44","date_gmt":"2022-08-09T11:42:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=8561"},"modified":"2022-08-09T11:42:44","modified_gmt":"2022-08-09T11:42:44","slug":"supreme-court-to-hear-case-on-gop-independent-legislature-theory-that-could-radically-reshape-elections","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=8561","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court to hear case on GOP \u2018independent legislature\u2019 theory that could radically reshape elections"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\n\n&#8220;The North Carolina Supreme Court ruled in February that the state\u2019s congressional maps violated the state constitution&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2022\/02\/04\/north-carolina-congressional-map-struck-down-00005974\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">by illegally favoring Republicans<\/a>. The map \u2014 drawn by GOP legislators \u2014 could have given the party control of as many as 11 of the closely divided state\u2019s 14 districts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But the Republican legislators argued in an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court that the state court had extremely limited authority to police the legislature on federal election matters \u2014 a theory known as the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2022\/03\/09\/gop-pushes-for-an-earthquake-in-american-electoral-power-00015402\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u201cindependent state legislature\u201d theory<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The theory holds that state legislatures have near-uncheckable authority to set procedures for federal elections \u2014 and state courts have either a limited or even no ability to rule on those laws. The theory is based on a pair of clauses in the constitution, the Electors Clause and the Elections Clause, that mention state legislatures but do not explicitly mention the judiciary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Republicans have increasingly promoted the theory as a way around state courts that have recently struck down redistricting maps as partisan gerrymanders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cSome provisions of the Constitution are subject to reasonable debate. Others are not,\u201d&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/21\/21A455\/215523\/20220302164838186_21A455%20Amicus%20Brief%20RNC%20Supp.%20Applicants.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">read a friend of the court brief<\/a>&nbsp;from the Republican National Committee and other GOP committees earlier this year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cAbsent from the constitutionally mandated order of authority is any role for the state judiciary,\u201d the brief continued. \u201cNotwithstanding this omission, certain state and commonwealth courts have taken it upon themselves to appropriate the processes that belong to the politically accountable branches of government.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A Supreme Court ruling that state legislatures alone have the power to make decisions about federal elections, within the boundaries set by federal law, could have a dramatic impact on redistricting processes and election procedures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Actions by state legislatures could still be subject to challenge in federal courts, but state courts and even governors could be sidelined under the most expansive interpretations of the \u201cindependent state legislature\u201d theory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">With 30 state legislatures currently in Republican hands, GOP state legislative leaders would be strongly positioned to skew maps in their party\u2019s favor and to make changes Republican have sought to voting procedures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Four conservative justices \u2014 Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh \u2014 have signaled at least an openness to some version of the theory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The theory was also central to then-President Donald Trump\u2019s ultimately unsuccessful attempt to get states to appoint a slate of alternate electors in the 2020 presidential contest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court is likely to hear arguments in the case late this fall or early next year. The Supreme Court is also set to hear arguments in October in the case&nbsp;<em>Merrill v. Milligan<\/em>, which&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2022\/06\/27\/supreme-court-voting-rights-act-00042478\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">election lawyers and civil rights groups<\/a>&nbsp;worry could undermine the Voting Rights Act.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2022\/06\/30\/supreme-court-gop-independent-legislature-theory-reshape-elections-00043471\">https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2022\/06\/30\/supreme-court-gop-independent-legislature-theory-reshape-elections-00043471<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;The North Carolina Supreme Court ruled in February that the state\u2019s congressional maps violated the state constitution by illegally favoring Republicans. The map \u2014 drawn by GOP legislators \u2014 could have given the party control of as many as 11 of the closely divided state\u2019s 14 districts.<\/p>\n<p>But the Republican legislators argued in an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court that the state court had extremely limited authority to police the legislature on federal election matters \u2014 a theory known as the \u201cindependent state legislature\u201d theory.<\/p>\n<p>The theory holds that state legislatures have near-uncheckable authority to set procedures for federal elections \u2014 and state courts have either a limited or even no ability to rule on those laws. The theory is based on a pair of clauses in the constitution, the Electors Clause and the Elections Clause, that mention state legislatures but do not explicitly mention the judiciary.<\/p>\n<p>Republicans have increasingly promoted the theory as a way around state courts that have recently struck down redistricting maps as partisan gerrymanders.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSome provisions of the Constitution are subject to reasonable debate. Others are not,\u201d read a friend of the court brief from the Republican National Committee and other GOP committees earlier this year.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAbsent from the constitutionally mandated order of authority is any role for the state judiciary,\u201d the brief continued. \u201cNotwithstanding this omission, certain state and commonwealth courts have taken it upon themselves to appropriate the processes that belong to the politically accountable branches of government.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A Supreme Court ruling that state legislatures alone have the power to make decisions about federal elections, within the boundaries set by federal law, could have a dramatic impact on redistricting processes and election procedures.<\/p>\n<p>Actions by state legislatures could still be subject to challenge in federal courts, but state courts and even governors could be sidelined under the most expansive interpretations of the \u201cindependent state legislature\u201d theory.<\/p>\n<p>With 30 state legislatures currently in Republican hands, GOP state legislative leaders would be strongly positioned to skew maps in their party\u2019s favor and to make changes Republican have sought to voting procedures.<\/p>\n<p>Four conservative justices \u2014 Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh \u2014 have signaled at least an openness to some version of the theory.<\/p>\n<p>The theory was also central to then-President Donald Trump\u2019s ultimately unsuccessful attempt to get states to appoint a slate of alternate electors in the 2020 presidential contest.<\/p>\n<p>The court is likely to hear arguments in the case late this fall or early next year. The Supreme Court is also set to hear arguments in October in the case Merrill v. Milligan, which election lawyers and civil rights groups worry could undermine the Voting Rights Act.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[1104,431,660,198,528,479],"class_list":["post-8561","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-share","tag-authoritarianism","tag-democracy","tag-dictatorship","tag-elections","tag-supreme-court","tag-voting"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8561","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8561"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8561\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8562,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8561\/revisions\/8562"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8561"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8561"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8561"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}