{"id":9416,"date":"2022-11-29T17:49:43","date_gmt":"2022-11-29T17:49:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=9416"},"modified":"2022-11-29T17:49:43","modified_gmt":"2022-11-29T17:49:43","slug":"a-judge-accepts-the-biden-administrations-dubious-argument-for-banning-gun-possession-by-marijuana-users","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=9416","title":{"rendered":"A Judge Accepts the Biden Administration’s Dubious Argument for Banning Gun Possession by Marijuana Users"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\n\n“President Joe Biden, who recently issued a mass pardon<\/a> for low-level marijuana offenders, says<\/a> cannabis consumption should not be treated as a crime. His administration nevertheless defends<\/a> the federal ban on gun possession by marijuana users, arguing that Second Amendment rights are limited to “law-abiding citizens.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, a federal judge agreed, dismissing<\/a> a challenge to that rule by medical marijuana patients in Florida. The reasoning underlying that decision shows that the constitutional right to armed self-defense, which the Supreme Court has<\/a> repeatedly<\/a> upheld<\/a>, is still subject to legislators’ arbitrary whims and irrational prejudices.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

…<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Winsor noted a long history of banning gun ownership by people convicted of certain crimes. But as Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett pointed out<\/a> in a 2019 dissent<\/a> as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, that history does not suggest that any crime, or even any felony, will do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“Legislatures have the power to prohibit dangerous people from possessing guns,” Barrett wrote. “But that power extends only to people who are dangerous<\/em>.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are cannabis consumers dangerous? Winsor suggested that they are, accepting the Biden administration’s analogy between the gun ban for marijuana users and laws enacted in the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries that prohibited people from either carrying or firing guns “while intoxicated.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That analogy fails, however, because those laws did not impose general bans on gun possession by drinkers. They applied only when gun owners were under the influence.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
A Judge Accepts the Biden Administration’s Dubious Argument for Banning Gun Possession by Marijuana Users<\/a><\/blockquote>