{"id":9661,"date":"2023-01-01T16:08:38","date_gmt":"2023-01-01T16:08:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=9661"},"modified":"2023-01-01T16:08:38","modified_gmt":"2023-01-01T16:08:38","slug":"the-weird-republican-turn-against-corporate-social-responsibility","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/?p=9661","title":{"rendered":"The weird Republican turn against corporate social responsibility"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>\n\n&#8220;ESG is not a regulation or a set of rules, and it does not require any real action from a corporation. It\u2019s mostly used as a catch-all term for any investment that considers social and environmental responsibility. In fact, what counts as ESG is so ill-defined and malleable&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.vox.com\/the-goods\/22714761\/esg-investing-divestment-fossil-fuels-climate-401k\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">it has been criticized<\/a>&nbsp;as a way to \u201cgreenwash\u201d corporate actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One of the defining ideas of ESG is that a company is better off accounting and reporting environmental and social risks to investors and clients, rather than being willfully blind to the world around it. This can include a broad swath of issues, such as a company\u2019s reliance on oil, gas, and coal, or exposure to sea-level rise in coastal operations, human rights violations of the countries it operates in, and lack of board diversity and CEO transparency. A big part of the ESG movement, at least right now, is largely about disclosure of these potential bottom-line risks in the future, not necessarily doing anything differently in the present.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But Republican officials in&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.spglobal.com\/marketintelligence\/en\/news-insights\/latest-news-headlines\/west-virginia-fires-blackrock-over-asset-manager-s-climate-and-china-stance-68468375\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">West Virginia<\/a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.axios.com\/2022\/08\/25\/texas-bans-blackrock-ubs-esg-backlash\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Texas<\/a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/business\/sustainable-business\/louisiana-remove-794-mln-blackrock-funds-over-esg-drive-2022-10-05\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Louisiana<\/a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/business\/sustainable-business\/missouri-pulls-500-mln-blackrock-over-asset-managers-esg-push-2022-10-18\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Missouri<\/a>, and now Florida have&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2022-12-01\/florida-will-pull-2-billion-of-assets-from-blackrock-over-esg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">withdrawn<\/a>&nbsp;billions of dollars from BlackRock\u2019s management. Proponents are planning to introduce a slew of bills in&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2022\/11\/01\/republicans-sustainable-investing-midterms-00064326\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">at least 15 states<\/a>&nbsp;next year to divest pensions and boycott companies for considering sustainability as an aim. At the federal level, House GOP lawmakers are preparing antitrust investigations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To get to the bottom of what is driving this, I spoke to one of the state officials leading the attack on ESG, Riley Moore, state treasurer of West Virginia. The way he sees it, \u201cbanks are coercing capital away\u201d from coal, gas, and oil industries. He explains he doesn\u2019t want the coal- and gas-reliant state to contract its financial services with a company that is \u201ctrying to diminish those dollars. They want less coal mining, they want less fracking.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is getting much bigger than BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, companies that used to be solidly at the right of corporate America. There are real stakes for pensioners, red-state taxpayers, and the wider economy if the GOP succeeds in scaring off financial institutions from pursuing climate targets.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;On the left, ESG has for years come under criticism as a form of greenwashing, and ESG disclosure isn\u2019t the same thing as corporate behavior. As&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/hbr.org\/2022\/08\/esg-investing-isnt-designed-to-save-the-planet\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Harvard Business Review<\/a>&nbsp;noted, the funding in ESG is \u201cdedicated to assuring returns for shareholders, not delivering positive planetary impact.\u201d Many environmentalists think ESG is a distraction from the main issue they\u2019d like to see traction on: companies disclosing the impact their products and investments have on the world around them, and accounting for that in decisions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ESG doesn\u2019t go this far. In no way will disclosure be enough to save the planet from climate change. There are no binding requirements, either. But what Republican critics of ESG really fear is that the financial world will realign with climate science and no longer see new coal plants and offshore drilling as viable projects to finance.&#8221;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Many of the Republican attacks on ESG stem from a misrepresentation of what it actually means. It\u2019s not always motivated by an altruistic climate or socialagenda. ESG also helps banks and public companies meet their one goal by screening investments for various risks. \u201cThey\u2019ve got a fiduciary duty to generate returns. So they\u2019re not going to impose some agenda, whether it\u2019s climate or social agenda, that\u2019s going to get in the way of returns,\u201d said University of Oxford business expert Robert Eccles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As baseless as the attacks have been, the pressure could still work. Vanguard on Wednesday announced it is withdrawing from the Net Zero Asset Managers coalition, in which companies voluntarily committed to reaching net-zero emissions in their portfolios by 2050.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vox.com\/energy-and-environment\/2022\/12\/10\/23496712\/esg-gop-climate-corporate-responsibility\">https:\/\/www.vox.com\/energy-and-environment\/2022\/12\/10\/23496712\/esg-gop-climate-corporate-responsibility<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;ESG is not a regulation or a set of rules, and it does not require any real action from a corporation. It\u2019s mostly used as a catch-all term for any investment that considers social and environmental responsibility. In fact, what counts as ESG is so ill-defined and malleable it has been criticized as a way to \u201cgreenwash\u201d corporate actions.<\/p>\n<p>One of the defining ideas of ESG is that a company is better off accounting and reporting environmental and social risks to investors and clients, rather than being willfully blind to the world around it. This can include a broad swath of issues, such as a company\u2019s reliance on oil, gas, and coal, or exposure to sea-level rise in coastal operations, human rights violations of the countries it operates in, and lack of board diversity and CEO transparency. A big part of the ESG movement, at least right now, is largely about disclosure of these potential bottom-line risks in the future, not necessarily doing anything differently in the present.<\/p>\n<p>But Republican officials in West Virginia, Texas, Louisiana, Missouri, and now Florida have withdrawn billions of dollars from BlackRock\u2019s management. Proponents are planning to introduce a slew of bills in at least 15 states next year to divest pensions and boycott companies for considering sustainability as an aim. At the federal level, House GOP lawmakers are preparing antitrust investigations.<\/p>\n<p>To get to the bottom of what is driving this, I spoke to one of the state officials leading the attack on ESG, Riley Moore, state treasurer of West Virginia. The way he sees it, \u201cbanks are coercing capital away\u201d from coal, gas, and oil industries. He explains he doesn\u2019t want the coal- and gas-reliant state to contract its financial services with a company that is \u201ctrying to diminish those dollars. They want less coal mining, they want less fracking.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This is getting much bigger than BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, companies that used to be solidly at the right of corporate America. There are real stakes for pensioners, red-state taxpayers, and the wider economy if the GOP succeeds in scaring off financial institutions from pursuing climate targets.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;On the left, ESG has for years come under criticism as a form of greenwashing, and ESG disclosure isn\u2019t the same thing as corporate behavior. As Harvard Business Review noted, the funding in ESG is \u201cdedicated to assuring returns for shareholders, not delivering positive planetary impact.\u201d Many environmentalists think ESG is a distraction from the main issue they\u2019d like to see traction on: companies disclosing the impact their products and investments have on the world around them, and accounting for that in decisions.<\/p>\n<p>ESG doesn\u2019t go this far. In no way will disclosure be enough to save the planet from climate change. There are no binding requirements, either. But what Republican critics of ESG really fear is that the financial world will realign with climate science and no longer see new coal plants and offshore drilling as viable projects to finance.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Many of the Republican attacks on ESG stem from a misrepresentation of what it actually means. It\u2019s not always motivated by an altruistic climate or social agenda. ESG also helps banks and public companies meet their one goal by screening investments for various risks. \u201cThey\u2019ve got a fiduciary duty to generate returns. So they\u2019re not going to impose some agenda, whether it\u2019s climate or social agenda, that\u2019s going to get in the way of returns,\u201d said University of Oxford business expert Robert Eccles.<\/p>\n<p>As baseless as the attacks have been, the pressure could still work. Vanguard on Wednesday announced it is withdrawing from the Net Zero Asset Managers coalition, in which companies voluntarily committed to reaching net-zero emissions in their portfolios by 2050.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[798,993,968,506],"class_list":["post-9661","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-article-share","tag-business","tag-corporations","tag-republican-party","tag-republicans"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9661","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9661"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9661\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9662,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9661\/revisions\/9662"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9661"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9661"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lonecandle.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9661"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}