Inside the Five Days That Remade the Supreme Court

The conservatives on the Supreme Court advanced the shadow docket as a prominent way to make impactful decisions while fighting with the Obama administration.They wanted to stop major Obama actions so that a final ruling wouldn’t come after the actions have already had a major impact. Yet, during the Trump administration, the shadow docket has often been used to allow Trump to go ahead with actions. The conservatives of the Supreme Court appear to be using the shadow docket to implement their political ideology, not execute sound and considered legal decisions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWpPuWH8TQk

Trump’s Tantrum Over the Tariff Decision Highlights His Narcissistic Authoritarianism

“Trump appointees who defy the president’s will are showing the courage of their convictions, applying the law as they understand it rather than reflexively deferring to the politician who gave them their jobs. But Trump, who takes it for granted that justices vote the way they do for political reasons, neither understands nor appreciates judicial independence.”

https://reason.com/2026/02/23/trumps-tantrum-over-the-tariff-decision-highlights-his-narcissistic-authoritarianism/

Trump’s New Tariffs Are Probably Illegal Too

“These new tariffs are likely unlawful too.
Indeed, Trump’s own attorneys even admitted as much during the legal battle over the original tariffs.

Trump is leaning on Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974

Section 122 allows presidents to impose tariffs of up to 15 percent for up to 150 days to “deal with large and serious United States balance-of-payments deficits.”

What’s that? The Trump administration wants to pretend—or perhaps wrongly believes—that it’s the same thing as a trade deficit. It’s not.

A balance-of-payments deficit is an archaic problem that existed before the introduction of floating exchange rates for foreign currencies. Changes made to the international monetary system in the 1970s—changes that Milton Friedman advocated, it’s worth noting—eliminated the circumstances that could lead to a balance-of-payments deficit.

“The United States does not have an international payments problem, fundamental or otherwise, and has not had one since we adopted a floating exchange rate more than five decades ago,” explains Bryan Riley, director of the Free Trade Initiative at the National Taxpayers Union. “Therefore, Section 122 does not give President Trump the legal authority to impose tariffs.”

Just like with the IEEPA tariffs, Trump’s use of Section 122 ignores the plain language of the law and invokes a broad executive power where Congress clearly provided a narrow one.”

https://reason.com/2026/02/23/trumps-new-tariffs-are-probably-illegal-too/

Illegal Tariffs Ruled Illegal (Again)

The Conservative Supreme Court justices can’t agree on what the major questions doctrine is and what exceptions to it should be.

The Supreme Court made a major change in how lower courts operate by limiting nationwide injunctions. Such injunctions could have prevented the US government from illegally taking all this money in the first place and avoided the issue of if, when, and to whom, the tariff money is paid back. This policy allows the president to act illegally for months or years until the Supreme Court finally resolves a case.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BQsRxvkcZI

What Comes Next for U.S. Trade Policy After the Supreme Court’s IEEPA Ruling?

Congress should codify Trump’s trade agreements so Trump can’t keep going back on them and creating more uncertainty in the economy.

Trump still has a variety of tariff powers, but they are more limited and require more hoops to jump through.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krb6SQKRdeg

She Honked at ICE. They Shot Her Five Times.

She Honked at ICE. They Shot Her Five Times. ICE then repeatedly lied about the event.

Justice Alito used one of these lies in a Supreme Court argument.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRZoGc3Wdpo

President Trump Reacts to Supreme Court Decision on Tariffs

If Trump thinks the powers given to him by the Congress are ridiculous, then he should complain to Congress, not the Supreme Court.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gp1_WrTSeD0

NOW DEVELOPING! Supreme Court Issues 9-0 Unanimous Decision With Major Nationwide Impacts!

The FBI raided the wrong house and arrested an innocent family, and tried to resist paying out when that family sued. The Supreme Court ruled that they don’t have special protection in these circumstances, but the government is using similar arguments to still not pay out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bngfNzKPA4