The US 2026 war on Iran is unconstitutional, but justified, however…is it a good idea?

The US military is awesome, but I’m skeptical it will achieve substantial war aims. Killing a lot of people and destroying a lot of equipment is a means to an end. It means very little if we don’t have a long-term major success. I’m skeptical the US and Israel will get there, but I hope they do.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxiMswJVBI4&t=2s

Should child gender transitions be banned? LC Video

Twenty-six U.S. states have banned certain medical interventions for children with gender dysphoria. In a free country, the barrier for straight up banning a medical intervention needs to be very high. The evidence needs to be overwhelming that such interventions are bad—that they do far more harm than good. That is not the case for puberty suppressing drugs, hormone replacement therapy, or even surgery. Such bans are an insult to liberty and should be removed.

If a doctor, parent, and child, all agree that a particular medical intervention is the best solution for their problem, then who the Hell is the government to stop them? Who the Hell are you to stop them? It doesn’t matter how you feel about transgenders, unless such interventions are clearly net bad for patients to the point where no reasonable person would perform them, they should not be banned.

There are lots of studies on transgender interventions, and there is some evidence that puberty suppression, hormones, and/or surgery help children and adolescents with their gender dysphoria, their quality of life, depression, and even lessens their chance of suicide. Unfortunately, that evidence is mixed and the studies are far from conclusive. Researchers on both sides seem biased and exaggerate the quality of evidence for their positions while undervaluing the evidence in favor of other positions.

The evidence is mixed enough that doctors and parents need to approach such decisions with a heavy dose of caution. The burden of evidence for stopping, and especially changing, a child’s natural puberty needs to fall on the intervention. If doctors are negligently transitioning kids who should not be transitioned, then those doctors should be charged and sued under normal medical malpractice or negligence laws. We don’t need to ban procedures to enforce basic medical law.

I strongly encourage parents and medical professionals to be careful about transitioning children, and for parents to get second opinions from different-thinking doctors. The evidence in favor of such interventions is quite modest, and it’s hard to tell which children are more likely to benefit from them. Nevertheless, such decisions should be in the hands of the parents, doctors, and the children, not the government. We are not truly a free country if medical interventions can be banned on such weak justifications.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o70COGCfz98

Medicare Advantage: Good? Or Bad? Part Six: Did Medicare Advantage Achieve its Goals?

Medicare Advantage: Good? Or Bad? Part Six: Did Medicare Advantage Achieve its Goals?

https://youtu.be/17Xx8VNNEjU

Medicare Advantage: Good? Or Bad? Part Five: Spillover, Switchers, Health Outcomes, Why people choose Advantage, and Insurers Game Reforms

Medicare Advantage: Good? Or Bad? Part Five: Spillover, Switchers, Health Outcomes, Why people choose Advantage, and Insurers Game Reforms

https://youtu.be/KAY6DQMuRGM

Medicare Advantage: Good? Or Bad? Part Two: Medicare Advantage Costs the Taxpayer More

Medicare Advantage: Good? Or Bad? Part Two: Medicare Advantage Costs the Taxpayer More

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFkm7WMxIc8

Medicare Advantage: Good? Or Bad? Part One: Introduction and Brief History

A main point to having private versions of Medicare ran by for-profit health insurance companies as an alternative option to Traditional Medicare is to save the taxpayer money by taking advantage of efficiencies gained in private competition and private flexibility while also