Britain and Colombia Cut Off U.S. Intelligence Access Over Caribbean Boat Bombings

“Both countries have been happy to cooperate with Washington against drug trafficking, but think that the decision to kill the suspected smugglers at sea is a step too far.

At least one of the people killed in the boat bombings was a Colombian citizen. “He may have been carrying fish, or he may have been carrying cocaine, but he had not been sentenced to death,” Petro said in a speech on Sunday, according to the Associated Press. “There was no need to murder him.” After Petro criticized the U.S. military campaign last month, the U.S. Treasury accused Petro of being complicit in drug smuggling and imposed financial sanctions on him, his wife, and his son.

Another neighboring country whose citizens were killed, Trinidad and Tobago, has been more supportive of the campaign. “I have no sympathy for traffickers; the US military should kill them all violently,” Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar said in a September 2025 statement.

The Trump administration has acknowledged that it is choosing to kill suspects that it could have arrested otherwise. “Instead of interdicting [the boat], on the president’s orders, we blew it up,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters after the first boat strike in September 2025. He argued that arresting traffickers and seizing their cargo “doesn’t work” because cartels plan for those losses anyway. Administration lawyers argue that drug cartels are wartime enemies, so they can be killed rather than arrested, while also denying that the president is limited by constitutional war powers in this campaign.”

https://reason.com/2025/11/12/britain-and-colombia-cut-off-u-s-intelligence-access-over-caribbean-boat-bombings/

The Democrat Who Split MAGA Over the Epstein Files | ‘The Opinions’ podcast

It is not normal for the justice department or the FBI to release the internal files of an investigation. Such files have lots of speculations and falsehoods in them, and releasing them can falsely destroy people’s reputations.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1i5jTtkPr0

Congress Orders Trump to Release the Epstein Files

A small Republican rebellion helped get Congress to pass the order for Trump to release the Epstein files. Trump tried to stop the order, and once it was clear Trump was going to lose, he said he now supports it, and many Republican Congressmen who were going to vote against it, slavishly then voted for it once their dear leader gave them permission. Trump can release the Epstein files without Congress’s order, so if he really wanted to, he could just do it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFov-triEi8

Jeffrey Epstein: Trump ‘Spent Hours At My House’ With Victim

“In 2019, Epstein wrote to journalist Michael Wolff that Trump “asked me to resign,” apparently from Trump’s club, Mar-a-Lago. “[O]f course he knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop,” Epstein added.

Wolff told Epstein that Trump was going to be asked about their relationship, and Epstein asked Wolff to “craft an answer” for Trump. Wolff suggested that letting Trump deny their relationship in public would give Epstein leverage.

“If he says he hasn’t been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency,” Wolff wrote. “You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you, or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt.” CNN didn’t end up asking Trump the question, according to The New York Times.

the emails do suggest that Trump knew a lot more about Epstein than he let on—and that he has something to hide about their relationship.

In September 2025, the House Oversight Committee released a sexually suggestive letter from Trump to Epstein talking about their “wonderful secret.”

during the 2024 campaign, Trump offhandedly agreed to open up the government’s files on Epstein, a campaign promise he would come to regret. In February 2025, the department announced that it was releasing “The Epstein Files: Phase 1,” only to publish a set of already public documents. Shortly after, the Department of Justice informed Trump that his name appeared several times in Epstein’s case file, according to The Wall Street Journal.”

https://reason.com/2025/11/12/jeffrey-epstein-trump-spent-hours-at-my-house-with-victim/

Oregon Woman Says ICE Broke Out Her Car Windows and Detained Her for Filming Them

“The First Amendment protects filming the police, but Berenice Garcia-Hernandez says she was dragged out of her car and detained for nearly seven hours for snapping photos of ICE agents.”

https://reason.com/2025/11/12/oregon-woman-says-ice-broke-out-her-car-windows-and-detained-her-for-filming-them/

Federal Judge Orders Over 600 ICE Detainees To Be Released From Custody

“A federal judge in Chicago ordered roughly 600 people to be released from immigration detention…The individuals, the judge found, had been arrested in violation of a 2022 consent decree designed to ensure immigration agents have probable cause before making warrantless arrests.”

https://reason.com/2025/11/12/federal-judge-orders-over-600-ice-detainees-to-be-released-from-custody/

When German Christians Worshipped Hitler: A Warning for American Evangelicals

In Hitler’s Germany, many Christians sought out Hitler and offered their support as Christians. Other Christians stood by while Hitler took over and did and said nothing, sometimes making excuses for Hitler.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLd3LIQ0-Ro

Less Indictable Than a Ham Sandwich

“The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution says, with only a handful of exceptions: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury.” In practice, though, grand juries rarely fail to indict. The entire process is nonadversarial, meaning prosecutors make their case to jurors without an opposing attorney making any counterarguments, and the burden of proof is much lower than it would be at trial. As the old saw has it, a prosecutor could get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich. But failing to get indictments has been a hallmark of the second Trump administration.”

https://reason.com/2025/11/16/less-indictable-than-a-ham-sandwich/