Trump Cuts Crash Social Security Website 4 Times In 10 Days

Trump and Musk Social Security cuts are causing difficulties for recipients.

Cuts include attempts to stop people from scamming recipients and customer service.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IFJIxDRd0E

Why DOGE is struggling to find fraud in Social Security

“But less than 1 percent of Social Security’s payments in recent years were determined to be improper – often the result of an accidental oversight or change in benefit status, according to a report last year by the agency’s inspector general. That works out to about $9 billion a year, and more than two-thirds of the mistaken payments were eventually clawed back. Another agency audit, which looked only at payments to retired workers, survivors and people with disabilities, found fraud was listed as the cause behind just 3 percent of improper benefit payments.”

“The degree of scrutiny by Social Security’s IG can be intense. One report issued by the office earlier this month found that a partner agency in Mississippi had incorrectly made a $14 payment because of a data-entry error.

Social Security’s inspector general was fired in the first days of the Trump administration, along with top internal investigators at 16 other government agencies. Although the office has continued to operate, it is expected to lose up to 20 percent of its staff because of budget cuts, Rose said.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-doge-struggling-fraud-social-132603335.html

MAGA Boomers About To Have Serious Regrets

Trump and Musk are exaggerating the level of fraud in Social Security and are cutting it in a way that will hurt seniors.

Musk has unlimited money to spend on political campaigns, giving him great influence over congress members who fear Musk will spend money for their primary opponents.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6ErMIViLzM

Sam Debates Conservative Struggling To Understand How Social Security Works

Social Security keeps 2/3s of our elderly out of poverty.

Illegal immigrants are a net positive to Social Security because they sometimes pay into it and rarely get anything out of it.

Taxation to fund welfare for our society is not punishment.

Too many people don’t make enough to save enough for retirement without Social Security. We can’t realistically expect people to save enough to retire without Social Security.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD2mpvz7Efk

Dead People Aren’t Bankrupting Us

“”Part of the confusion comes from Social Security’s software system based on the COBOL programming language, which has a lack of date type,” reported the Associated Press last month in response to DOGE reports about improper payments. “This means that some entries with missing or incomplete birthdates will default to a reference point of more than 150 years ago.” (The agency auto-stops payments to those older than 115.) The Social Security Administration’s inspector general has admitted as much: The agency is really struggling to figure out how to “properly annotate death information in its database” per the A.P., and there are nearly 20 million Social Security numbers of people born in 1920 and earlier who haven’t been marked as dead. But Trump is conflating “not marked as dead in a database” with “received benefits”—an absolutely wild leap we have no evidence to support. In fact, the July 2023 report from the inspector general notes that “almost none of the numberholders discussed in the report currently receive SSA payments.””

https://reason.com/2025/03/05/dead-people-arent-bankrupting-us/

France’s Bayrou buys himself time with overture to Socialists

“Raising the pension age has long been one of the most contentious issues in French politics. The country enjoys a generous welfare state, but as public debt piles up, policymakers are increasingly desperate to make savings.”

https://www.politico.eu/article/france-prime-minister-francois-bayrou-retirement-age-socialists/

Public housing didn’t fail in the US. But it was sabotaged.

“the demise of public housing was not an inevitable outcome. As my colleague Rachel Cohen has pointed out, other countries have successfully pulled it off. Governments around the world have shown that they can operate mixed-income housing developments that have reliable maintenance and upkeep and that public housing doesn’t have to segregate poor people away from the middle class.
So why did public housing in the United States age so poorly?”

“efforts to undermine public housing are about as old as the efforts to build it. From the outset, opposition was fierce. Many Americans didn’t like the idea of the government using their tax dollars to subsidize poor people’s housing, and real estate developers were concerned about having to compete with the government.

The Housing Act of 1949, which had a goal of providing “a decent home and a suitable living environment for every American family,” bolstered America’s public housing plans by heavily investing in the construction of new housing units. But by then, the federal government had already undermined its own stated plans by capping construction costs (which encouraged using cheap materials and discouraged modern appliances) and allowing racial segregation. Congress had also doomed public housing authorities’ ability to raise revenue through rents in 1936 when it passed the George-Healey Act, which established income limits for who can qualify for public housing — making mixed-income public housing models impossible for federally funded projects.

As housing projects started to draw more Black residents, white people who lived in public housing started leaving, especially after the Civil Rights Acts of the 1960s banned racial discrimination in housing. This was partly because the Federal Housing Authority pushed for more people to own homes and expanded its loans mostly to white people, helping white families move out of the projects. Black families didn’t receive the same opportunity.

“You saw a change in the racial composition, which simply added to the stigma and the pattern of administrative neglect that characterized many housing authorities,” the historian Ed Goetz told The Atlantic in 2015.

Starting with President Richard Nixon — who declared that the US government had turned into “the biggest slumlord in history” and suspended federal spending on subsidized housing — public housing started facing serious austerity measures and never recovered. Federal investments shifted away from building new public housing units and toward housing vouchers and public-private partnerships.

In the decades that followed, public housing started declining in quality, and Congress funded a program to demolish dilapidated public housing units and replace them with newly constructed or renovated mixed-income developments. But according to the National Low Income Housing Coalition, those demolitions were an “overcorrection”; public housing simply needed more funding and better management.”

https://www.vox.com/policy/390082/public-housing-america-policy-failure-poverty

Medicare Advantage: Good? Or Bad? Part Six: Did Medicare Advantage Achieve its Goals?

Medicare Advantage: Good? Or Bad? Part Six: Did Medicare Advantage Achieve its Goals?

https://youtu.be/17Xx8VNNEjU

Medicare Advantage: Good? Or Bad? Part Five: Spillover, Switchers, Health Outcomes, Why people choose Advantage, and Insurers Game Reforms

Medicare Advantage: Good? Or Bad? Part Five: Spillover, Switchers, Health Outcomes, Why people choose Advantage, and Insurers Game Reforms

https://youtu.be/KAY6DQMuRGM