Congress Questions Strikes as Another General Steps Down

Multiple high level military men have stepped down as the Trump administration appears to murder suspected drug traffickers. The administration showed their intel justifying the strikes only to some Republican Congressmen rather than to members of both parties, so Congress as a whole can’t even analyze the justifications.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wUXGd7P-0g

Miller Loses It Over Pritzker’s Plan To Hold ICE Accountable

Stephen Miller threatens the arrest of governors or anyone else who gets in the way of ICE.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j15__atsXrc

Trump Says Tariffs Are About National Security. Pentagon Officials Say They Need a Tariff Exemption.

“the “national security” argument clearly has been foundational to Trump’s trade policies. Higher tariffs will make America’s military more self-sufficient and capable against future threats; that’s the White House’s point of view.

One problem: that’s not how the people actually in charge of America’s national security see it.

“The Defense Department routinely acquires items and materials from foreign sources indispensable to meet defense needs that are not readily available or produced in sufficient quantities within the United States,” wrote John Tanaglia, director of pricing, contracting, and acquisitions for the Pentagon, in a memo dated August 25.

The memo instructs other officials at the Pentagon to provide “duty-free entry certificates” to military purchases that would otherwise be subject to tariffs. Doing so, the memo explains, will “maximize the Department’s budget to meet warfighter needs.”

First and foremost, that’s yet more proof that tariffs are raising costs for American purchasers of foreign goods. And it is true, of course, that Trump’s tariffs are straining budgets everywhere. Being able to ignore those costs must be nice—many, many businesses across the United States surely wish they had the power to simply wave away those costs as easily as the Pentagon apparently can.”

https://reason.com/2025/10/15/trump-says-tariffs-are-about-national-security-pentagon-officials-say-they-need-a-tariff-exemption/

Al Qaeda Is on the Brink of Taking Over a Country

“Al Qaeda militants are moving closer to seizing the capital of the West African nation of Mali, which, should the city fall, would become the first country in the world run by the U.S.-designated terrorist group.

The rapid advance of the jihadists in Africa comes after Islamist groups took power in both Afghanistan and Syria, but, if they take Bamako, it would be the first time militants with direct and current connections to al Qaeda achieve such a feat.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/al-qaeda-is-on-the-brink-of-taking-over-a-country/ar-AA1PvqNq?ocid=msedgntp&pc=NMTS&cvid=6903d3e43ef64d89913dfe5a24d0a15f&ei=7

Sarbanes-Oxley Promised To Protect Investors. It Ended Up Freezing Them Out.

“The law imposed a set of strict internal accounting controls and, most famously, imposed criminal penalties on CEOs who knowingly signed off on quarterly earnings reports that were found to be fraudulent in any way.

Just over 23 years later, the law is considered a success. Since its passage, there have basically been no major corporate accounting scandals

What they likely never realized is the massive unintended consequences caused by their law, which we are still living with to this day—consequences more severe than if existing laws and self-correcting market forces were used to deal with the deceptive accounting that was occurring.

For starters, SOX is very expensive to comply with, typically costing companies millions of dollars per year, on an ongoing basis, and thousands of man-hours. The increased administrative cost has affected companies’ decisions to go public. Some firms simply do not want the additional regulatory scrutiny that is associated with being public. As a result, fewer companies have gone public over time. In the late 1990s, there were more than 6,500 public companies; today, that number stands at 4,700, depending on the index. There are not even enough public companies to fill the Wilshire 5000 Index, which is a measure of the total market capitalization in the United States. As of 2025, there are now more exchange-traded funds than publicly traded stocks. Having said that, the regulatory burden of SOX is certainly one of many factors that determine whether companies go public. Some don’t want the scrutiny from Wall Street analysts. Some don’t want to be exposed to shareholder lawsuits. Some don’t want to deal with activist investors. But the cost of SOX is the primary factor.”

https://reason.com/2025/10/15/sarbanes-oxley-promised-to-protect-investors-it-ended-up-freezing-them-out/

Prosecutors placed on leave hours after describing Jan. 6 attack as a ‘mob of rioters’

Prosecutors punished for stating truths Trump doesn’t like.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/29/jan-6-prosecutors-case-leave-00627086

Judge extends order barring mass firings of federal workers during shutdown

“A federal judge has indefinitely extended her order banning the Trump administration from mass firing federal employees during the government shutdown.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/28/government-shutdown-federal-workers-rifs-ruling-00626042

SNAP benefits set for first-ever lapse with Senate set to reject funding patches

“Senate Republicans will block a Democratic bill that would keep federal food aid flowing to 42 million Americans as they try to build pressure to reopen the government, Majority Leader John Thune said Wednesday.

Thune separately told reporters that if the Senate starts “going down the road of … take care of this group or that group … it just begs the larger question, how long is this going to drag on?”

Democrats and even privately some Republican lawmakers argue the Trump administration has the legal authority to tap a $5 billion contingency fund, or other USDA funds, to ensure SNAP benefits keep flowing during the shutdown. Dozens of Democratic governors and attorneys general have sued the administration over its decision not to tap those funds.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/29/snap-benefits-set-for-first-ever-lapse-with-senate-set-to-reject-funding-patches-00627280